I meant in design rather than actual amount of buildings, it just feels weird to me that all the building so far are max 3 stores tall and then at the far end you build one that’s 10 stories tall???
This actually makes the resort much more symmetrical. There are currently 6 longhouses and a pool East of the GCH with 3 longhouses and no pool West of the GCH. If your instinct is that the resort should be balanced with the GCH at the center and equal "wings" on both sides, this helps.
The tree still exits - just moved it. It's doing well.Such a monstrosity. I still can’t believe they got rid of the banyan tree and luau.
Assuming the concept art is accurate, it has reached maximum height aside from whatever is added by the angled awning. The entire section currently built to the left of the elevator shaft will ultimately match the height of the elevator shaft before being capped off, and the other parts farther left and right will stair-step down by a couple of floors with each section.Has it reached its peak height? How much taller then the GF DVC is it? I really wish they had build this in the current parking lot and connected it to the GCH. This just feels so lopsided on the resort.
I’m no fan of this. My only major concern though is if this will be visible from within the resort. Will this tower over everything or is it relatively hidden until you go out of your way closer to the beach to look for it?
What is Disney's ultimate goal --to have nothing but DVC and to hell with guest resort hotels The last guest resort build was-----"Since 2004 there has only been one new hotel, which is Disney’s Art of Animation.
The list of DVC sure has gown and those built sure do over shadow the guest resorts. leads me to believe there is more money in DVC
Disneyland in Anaheim? Not sure I follow you on that.Another reason why “Disneyland” and “Tokyo Disney” feel less touristy and are more affordable.
I agree about the lack of DVC, though there are a few at DL and they are adding more. I think it's the guaranteed money for DVC. They open one up, they sell all its points. A few years down the road, some of the people who bought those points don't want them anymore, sell them, Disney gobbles up the cheap ones and then resells them for even more points than the original offers and there are less years to use them! It's actually very weird and I don't think there is anything else that works like it, and I say that as a DVC(resale) owner.Timeshares do not have a dominating presence in California or Tokyo. Anaheim and Tokyo being local’s parks was my point, and therefore they are not catering to the same crowd (while obviously they are expanding Disneyland’s presence of DVCs, it is still an insignificant portion of hotel rooms).
The hotels they have are actually affordable, and either a monorail or walk away from the parks. While the vast majority are not themed like Disney used to do, they aren’t priced like it like DVC is.
Unfortunately, WDW’s strong suit, their incredible resorts like Animal Kingdom Lodge, Wilderness Lodge, and Polynesian Village, are being built no more, and have been traded in for cheaply themed DVC towers that are trying to woo people that are willing to pay for deluxe prices, and it has most obviously gotten worse over the last decade from Riviera to whatever this “thing” is.
They don’t have to try anymore with timeshares as it’s guaranteed to force people to visit WDW which is a shame because it locks someone into the American parks (but mostly WDW), and semi-prevents them from seeing other resorts.
So building cheap DVC towers (thus, expanding the “deluxe” expensive to build hotel capacity by moving guests away from them) makes a LOT of sense from a business perspective, but it’s getting to the point that it’s actually downgrading the beauty of the resort.
It would be one thing if the parks could compete with the two resorts I mentioned, but they can’t individually, so WDW’s saving grace is sort of, dwindling I’d say?
I am aware of timeshares not being big in either location. Correlation does not equal causation.Timeshares do not have a dominating presence in California or Tokyo. Anaheim and Tokyo being local’s parks was my point, and therefore they are not catering to the same crowd (while obviously they are expanding Disneyland’s presence of DVCs, it is still an insignificant portion of hotel rooms).
The hotels they have are actually affordable, and either a monorail or walk away from the parks. While the vast majority are not themed like Disney used to do, they aren’t priced like it like DVC is.
Unfortunately, WDW’s strong suit, their incredible resorts like Animal Kingdom Lodge, Wilderness Lodge, and Polynesian Village, are being built no more, and have been traded in for cheaply themed DVC towers that are trying to woo people that are willing to pay for deluxe prices, and it has most obviously gotten worse over the last decade from Riviera to whatever this “thing” is.
They don’t have to try anymore with timeshares as it’s guaranteed to force people to visit WDW which is a shame because it locks someone into the American parks (but mostly WDW), and semi-prevents them from seeing other resorts.
So building cheap DVC towers (thus, expanding the “deluxe” expensive to build hotel capacity by moving guests away from them) makes a LOT of sense from a business perspective, but it’s getting to the point that it’s actually downgrading the beauty of the resort.
It would be one thing if the parks could compete with the two resorts I mentioned, but they can’t individually, so WDW’s saving grace is sort of, dwindling I’d say?
I wasn’t talking about the rooms, but the lack of themed design throughout the resort, as they’ve clearly realized the cost-benefit is just not
there for DVC to theme.
Disney didn’t say anything about which Riviera the resort was based on. The English Riviera was at one point recently said to be the 5th most expensive property area in the world!This is what the French Riviera actually looks like.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.