New Mummy Press Release

CTXRover

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally posted by AndyMagic
I find it odd that the animatronics of the Mummy himself are STILL not in the ride despite it officially opening in about a month. Wonder when they plan on installing him.

I've heard very soon but no real time frame is established and the official opening date is NOT set yet. There was apparently a delay in their construction and another in the shipment of the animatronics to the ride (I honestly don't know where they were built or are being shipped from). From what I can gather there are three animatronics missing at this point. One of Reggie....a "tour guide" who will be introduced in the pre-show, one of Imhotep "taking" the soul of Reggie and the last animatronic at the "fake-ending". There is still some debate, however, if there is in fact an animatronic that either chases or jumps on the vehicles. The other (6, I think) warrior Mummy animatronics are already set and working.

As an amendement to the ride length question....it is very close to 3 1/2 minutes....shorter than what I originally had heard but still a very good length for a thrill ride.
 

AndyMagic

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by CTXRover
The other (6, I think) warrior Mummy animatronics are already set and working.
According to what I have read, these "warrior mummies" aren't technically animatronics (although they appear to be in the early photos). According to a review I read, they don't really move and they just pop out and scare you instead. I could have sworn they looked like animatronics in the early pictures of fabrication.
 

CTXRover

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally posted by AndyMagic
According to what I have read, these "warrior mummies" aren't technically animatronics (although they appear to be in the early photos). According to a review I read, they don't really move and they just pop out and scare you instead. I could have sworn they looked like animatronics in the early pictures of fabrication.

Yea, I think we were all mistaken on that one. They are just static 3-D props that pop out very quickly to give you a quick surprise. They have no actual movement. Perhaps this and other things that are finally being realized, such as the fact that the mummy spirits during the coaster part are simple cutouts and not CGI projected on dense fog screens as once reported, are a reflection that this ride unfortunately did in fact have a budget to work with and not everything could be incorporated as is the case for many ride ideas.
 

MrNonacho

Premium Member
It seems the more I read about this ride the less excited about it I get, and I was VERY excited to begin with. If the ride is majorly improved by the addition of the missing show scenes, then I'd have to wonder what Universal was thinking when they allowed employee previews so early. Surely they'd know that reviews would be written?
 

AndyMagic

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by imagineer boy
Yup. Those Mummy Soldiers are as advanced Universal gets with Audio Animatronics.:lol:
Ahh but the ride will feature three of the most advanced animatronic figures ever engineered. They just aren't installed yet. As for the various negative things we are discovering about the ride... that is normal. Disney took 3 years to construct M:S and the rumors flying around about that ride were that it would change rides forever and that it would be the most amazing experience. Well, I LOVE Mission: SPACE but of course, it couldn't live up to the hype. Mummy is the same way. Also, if you remember, M:S too had several rumored, "effects" that never made it off the drawing board thanks to massive budget cuts. This is quite normal and has happened to even our favorite rides of today. Remember... WDW's Pirates of the Caribbean had MASSIVE budget cuts which resulted in it being much shorter and less detailed than Disneylands yet it is still a huge park favorite and one of the most famous rides in the world. I'm not worried about being dissapointed because I always new it wouldn't live up to the massive PR hype.
 

CTXRover

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Quick aside: I hope we all start to realize that ALL projects have budgets and the often extragavant effects that sometimes start from just a rumor on a website are not necessarily cut just because the company didn't want to cough up the dough...its just ideas are often way too big and things are ALWAYS scaled back from their original ideas to make them feasible....the same will happen with Everest, I'm sure. I'm not surprised at all to finally start to hear that Mummy may have been WAY over hyped the same way MS was for many. Simple things in press releases for both Mummy and MS were overblown like some taking Mummy's release to signal the use of CGI projections on dense layers of fog that you would ride through or that MS would have sustained weightless effects. If you carefully read the press releases in both these cases, you will see that what was said was taken out of context given the final product.
 

imagineer99

New Member
It's weird to hear you talking about budgets while talking about Universal.

Everyone always makes it seem like they have an unlimited amount of Cash to build rides with.

In comparison, who pushes more money to build rides, Disney or Universal?
 

AndyMagic

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by imagineer99
It's weird to hear you talking about budgets while talking about Universal.

Everyone always makes it seem like they have an unlimited amount of Cash to build rides with.

In comparison, who pushes more money to build rides, Disney or Universal?
It's really hard to say. Disney has more parks to keep track of has to "spread the wealth" throughout them. Also, it is difficult to say because many rides don't have official numbers released. Some people say Disney inflates their numbers to make it seem very important while some say they underestimate. I DO know that Universal spent a ridiculous amount of money on Islands of Adventure compared to Animal Kingdom. However, many rides at Universal usually fall under 100 million. Spider-Man was apparently 85 million dollars, Men in Black was 70 million, and ROTM, it depends who you ask. Some say each ride was about 80-90 million while others say that BOTH Mummy rides at Hollywood and Orlando collectively cost 90 million. So like I said, it is hard to say. One thing that IS clear is that Disney likes to spend money on shows, fireworks, random events as well while Universal typically saves up to build a huge E-Ticket ride every few years. They spend their money differently and it makes sense if you think about. Universal needs those high-tech groundbreaking rides to bring people back. Disney, on the other hand, specializes in "family entertainment" which means MANY other things besides rides. However in my opinion, Disney spends far too much money on certain things and I often ask the question, "Where did it go." Such is the case with M:S and Test Track. Also, I'm pretty sure that Disney often includes R and D (Research and Development) in their announced budget totals while Universal just announces total cost of fabrication. This makes sense because M:S and Test Track both took massive amounts of research to perfect but in terms of the rides themsevles, they certainly don't seem like 200 million dollar rides when Spider-Man was built for around 90 million.
 

imagineer99

New Member
Originally posted by AndyMagic
It's really hard to say. Disney has more parks to keep track of has to "spread the wealth" throughout them. Also, it is difficult to say because many rides don't have official numbers released. Some people say Disney inflates their numbers to make it seem very important while some say they underestimate. I DO know that Universal spent a ridiculous amount of money on Islands of Adventure compared to Animal Kingdom. However, many rides at Universal usually fall under 100 million. Spider-Man was apparently 85 million dollars, Men in Black was 70 million, and ROTM, it depends who you ask. Some say each ride was about 80-90 million while others say that BOTH Mummy rides at Hollywood and Orlando collectively cost 90 million. So like I said, it is hard to say. One thing that IS clear is that Disney likes to spend money on shows, fireworks, random events as well while Universal typically saves up to build a huge E-Ticket ride every few years. They spend their money differently and it makes sense if you think about. Universal needs those high-tech groundbreaking rides to bring people back. Disney, on the other hand, specializes in "family entertainment" which means MANY other things besides rides. However in my opinion, Disney spends far too much money on certain things and I often ask the question, "Where did it go." Such is the case with M:S and Test Track. Also, I'm pretty sure that Disney often includes R and D (Research and Development) in their announced budget totals while Universal just announces total cost of fabrication. This makes sense because M:S and Test Track both took massive amounts of research to perfect but in terms of the rides themsevles, they certainly don't seem like 200 million dollar rides when Spider-Man was built for around 90 million.

That's interesting...When you think about the money disney spends on constant fireworks shows, parades, and many other entertainment venues, it becomes clear that Universal is able to spend a lot more cash directly on the rides themeselves. After all, I don't think Universal has ever had a parade.

Regarding Test Track, I think I can understand its immense cost. For one, the imagineers couldn't start from scratch. They had to completely change World of Motion into a a brand new attraction. I think such remodeling surpasses what was done with King Kong. Thus, it must have been a logistical nightmare to completley remove World of Motion so that Test Track could be installed. Then comes the technology...

As you said, TT took tons of research to cause it to come to fruition. Also, I don't think a ride vehicle impresses me more than the TT vehicles. They are able to quickly change speeds, brake, slow down, turn, stop all at the exact moment without the aid of any outside propulsion or track. That's really impressive. Not to mention the onboard computing technology that these vehicles contain. These vehicles run 24/7 and are able to withstand some pretty harsh conditions.

However, I must agree that Disney seems to spend so much on rides. After all, Disney could build a big cinderblock warehouse in the middle of nowhere and it would still cost $100 million.

Anyways, getting back on topic, I think the mummy looks very cool. Is the "switching trtack" effect going to be similar to what Everest has planned?
 

NemoRocks78

Seized
Originally posted by AndyMagic
Well, I LOVE Mission: SPACE but of course, it couldn't live up to the hype.

I feel the exact same way. I love it, but it didn't live up to what I was expecting, and I would take back Horizons any day.

With Employee Previews now under way, openings should be coming very soon. I'm still waiting for my AP Preview invite! Oh when will it ever come??? :D
 

CTXRover

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I thought it was a little funny in the JHM review, and yet another example that Universal themselves may have overhyped parts of the ride, when the press releases said Mummy would be a cross between the immersiveness of Spiderman and the thrills of "THE HULK" and now the "thrill" of the coaster sections are being compared to being a step above "Woody Woodpecker's Nuthouse Coaster" :lol:
 

imagineer99

New Member
Originally posted by NemoRocks78
I feel the exact same way. I love it, but it didn't live up to what I was expecting, and I would take back Horizons any day.

With Employee Previews now under way, openings should be coming very soon. I'm still waiting for my AP Preview invite! Oh when will it ever come??? :D

Nemo, I'm expecting a full review....:wave:
 

AndyMagic

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by CTXRover
I thought it was a little funny in the JHM review, and yet another example that Universal themselves may have overhyped parts of the ride, when the press releases said Mummy would be a cross between the immersiveness of Spiderman and the thrills of "THE HULK" and now the "thrill" of the coaster sections are being compared to being a step above "Woody Woodpecker's Nuthouse Coaster" :lol:
He's crazy... the coaster portions are pretty darn thrilling and many cast members have said they can't hold back the screams. Mind you, it won't be nearly as intense as the Hulk (nor should it be) but it should be pretty darn thrilling.
 

CTXRover

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally posted by AndyMagic
He's crazy... the coaster portions are pretty darn thrilling and many cast members have said they can't hold back the screams. Mind you, it won't be nearly as intense as the Hulk (nor should it be) but it should be pretty darn thrilling.

I by no means think that Mummy's coaster parts won't be thrilling and I know it is much better than Woody Woodpecker's coaster (for goodness sakes....Mummy is a launched coaster!!), but I just thought it was funny that the coaster of choice to compare to was Woody Woodpecker's Nuthouse coaster when the original press releases insinuated the thrill level WOULD be more comparable to the Hulk....but this apparently isn't the only thing Universal exaggerated a bit in their press releases concerning this ride....;)
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by CTXRover
More than 3,000 sheets of gold foil were used to create the Mummy's gleaming treasure in the attractions - foil that is typically used as wrapping paper for hamburgers. [/B]

I particularly like this part. Can’t help but wonder what genus in the marketing department thought this was something that would impress the public. :lol:
 

Disney2002

New Member
Originally posted by AndyMagic
I'm pretty sure that the "minions" are not cuttouts. They are projections. Also important to note about the audio aspects... Mummy has audio both on the vehicle and in the actual set pieces of the attraction. RnR has more wattage pumping through the trains but none in the actual ride building.

I always though the near-collision car crash effect was played in the room and not on ride audio, or is it just perfectly synchronised?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom