LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
I haven’t identified it as problematic, nor have I framed my comments in terms of “our present level of morality”. And, as I’ve stated twice already, I’m not rooting for a change.Except that, trouble is, more often than not, when a problematic (or "problematic", as the case may be) element of the parks has been identified and changed, infantilization has been the result. So in effect, if you are rooting for such a change, you are endorsing the infantilization of the parks.
I think the suicide depiction is a product of generalized societal differences. Watch enough older films, Looney Tunes, etc. and you'll see that society used to be much cavalier about suicide, and more inclined to treat it as situation that could be mined for comedy. Obviously societal understanding has changed, but I think that accounts for the scene's inclusion and very much makes it a product of its time. It would not have been done the same way had the ride been built new today.
That said, I bristle at the notion that just because things don't precisely meet our present level of morality that we should immediately change them. That's a losing battle, and one that's likely to level the parks of anything interesting sooner than it would make everyone happy about the park's perceived level of morality in its attractions.
The problem with such discussions is that, no matter how precisely you try to express yourself, people assume you’re saying something more than you are. I’ve been about as clear as I can be, but I can see my words aren’t being understood as intended, so I think I’ll extricate myself from this exchange now.