AEfx
Well-Known Member
ET is also quite well hidden inthe back of Universal...I think most people might not even notice its there, unless they're looking for it, or just happen to see it on their way to the Fievel/Curious George area.
I think ET is one of the best attractions that Universal made on a "Disney" theming level.
Having said that, the one difference that Peter Pan might do better is that you're flying over the city and its all around you, whereas in ET you're off to the right of it
ET is amazing. Even just the queue is something I haven't even seen approached at Disney. All this Next Gen stuff is just gaudy junk in the queues, even Nemo, which has a nice queue, is still just a few obvious effects. Whereas ET is an experience, immediately immersing you in a dark forest. It's one of the very best in Orlando.
It's funny because so many Disney fans are so snotty about Universal, and it definitely has it's own faults and areas where it doesn't approach Disney (service, etc.), but it's become clear over time that Universal spends their money and effort on the attraction itself. And over at Disney we get 100M+ attractions like Everest where they can't see the forest for the trees, spend way too much money on stuff that doesn't matter nearly as much as the stuff they spent way too little on.
I'm in no way a "hater", but I don't know how anyone cannot see where the quality attractions have been built in the recent past (and not so recent, as ET is ancient comparatively) and where the "done on the cheap" attractions that rely on a big franchise to be popular (i.e. Toy Story Big TV Screens) instead of amazing attractions which utilize a big franchise (a distinct difference) have been built.