-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
New DAS System at Walt Disney World 2024
- Thread starter AEfx
- Start date
Dranth
Well-Known Member
Except it isn’t 8 minutes because the problem is the massive amount of ride utilization that is going to DAS, not because of people who need it, but because of the people that don’t. Go back and look at some of the numbers and levels Len was talking about and there is no way that is sustainable. We are talking 6 to 7 of every 10 people that gets let in front of you when in stand by is DAS.
Something has to change and until they can legally demand medical records as proof we are going to have to deal with changing systems that attempt to balance convince with reality in order to combat the garbage people who abuse the system.
Gomer
Well-Known Member
Apologies if I misinterpreted. In general I agree. They should crack down on abuse more. It gives those of us who use DAS appropriately a bad name and makes everyone's experience worse. They just have to be very careful about how they go about that.
Gomer
Well-Known Member
Yes I agree. They seem to have decided they can reduce overall DAS usage through the use of alternative accommodations for some disabilities. Which is definitely possible. Also might be a disaster ending up with them in court.
As of now I think they are perfectly within legal bounds with the changes rolled out, but they could easily botch that in execution if they aren't flexible and careful in what accommodations they offer those who now will not qualify for DAS.
So let’s say that’s true. I have no reason to believe it isn’t.
What does this new system change?
It just changes the lie the liars are going to use.
At best you get some relief with the 4 person limit.
So maybe a 15% reduction at the expense of people with real disabilities being denied.
haveyoumetmark
Well-Known Member
Reducing eligibility criteria will certainly curb the use and impact of this service.
But to do that, and then frame it as addressing abuse? Oh boy.
But to do that, and then frame it as addressing abuse? Oh boy.
Disney Analyst
Well-Known Member
What is to stop someone from saying they fit into the new DAS requirements, i.e. autism, if no paperwork is required?
Won't abuse / lies continue?
Won't abuse / lies continue?
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
If the system is being abused it’s a lot more than 5 minues../
The problem with US parks is that they have slowly taken them to the point where they have zero capacity for normal operations and hiccups. So even what you’d think is a small number of “above the line” DAS usage is going to make a significant logjam/cascade effect across the park. We have no room
For any added ingredients
shambolicdefending
Well-Known Member
This is why I'd be in favor of Disney getting even more strict. I think these changes will be helpful, but I'm not convinced they'll permanently curtail abuse. I am happy that they're at least trying to do something, though.
Nothing stops it.
People are going to abuse the system as always.
They only people being hurt here are actual disabled people.
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
They aren’t…they’re noting DAS is much higher than what would be in the normal statistical range.
Intensify…is my guess. The lines suck and genie is leaving a bad taste in everyone’s mouth.
Disney Analyst
Well-Known Member
Anyone who lies about a disability, to gain some sort of perceived advantage (in their mind), should be ashamed, and may they step on lego.
Not only do they make the experience harder for all guests, but they especially make it harder and worse for those with an actual disability.
Shame on them.
Gomer
Well-Known Member
To give Disney the benefit of the doubt (a losing proposition usually) we haven't really seen the part of this that is likely intended to curb abuse yet.
They are moving physical disabilities to alternative accommodations that don't require approval as one half of the equation. The other half is how the DAS approval with third party medical support will work in practice. Most of the abuse is presumably happening in the developmental disability space, and that is where they are revamping the approval process. How that plays out and how strict it is will tell us whether they are actually serious about curbing the abuse or not.
Jrb1979
Well-Known Member
Its not about making standby better. It's about getting bodies out of the LL queues. Limiting to 4 is a big help.
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Only if there’s no abuse. If that is not the case…then there could be an effect
ROFL
Your that gullible ?
Disney is going to wait a month to measure what type of impact this is making and then start selling more Genie and LL.
The line will be just as full as ever, except with more people paying $$$.
That’s what this is about, and nothing more.
DryerLintFan
Premium Member
Wait, no, that’s backwards. Or I’m backwards.
They’re approving developmental disabilities. Not revamping the approval for them. That’s the thing they’re keeping in the yes pile. Everything else goes into the no or maybe pile.
It will because there is no way Disney wants to have G+ lines be 30-45 min. They will increase the amount of G+ but not as much as the drop in DAS use. It will reduce standby by a little bit (15-20 min) but more importantly make standby lines move more regularly.
Gomer
Well-Known Member
yes, but there is still an approval process.
If you have a physical disability and want to use their return to queue system you can do so without pre-approval. In fact, I would assume any guest can use it.
DAS still needs pre-screening and approval of your condition. And they have added third party medical support to assist the cast member in determining eligibility. This to me implies that they intend to more strictly review these than they have in the past (where pretty much anyone saying they had a developmental disability was approved).
They could still approve everyone and have it be a free for all, but then why would they be paying this 3rd party for their services. It would be an unnecessary expense.