News New DAS System at Walt Disney World 2024

NotTheOne

Well-Known Member
One of the arguments that Disney had at the time was a free reservation system for front of the line access was available. They no longer have that argument.

Now that may or may not matter depending on other factors.
Fast Pass was never a front of the line system, nor did Disney ever argue that it was.

The idea that the only accommodation Disney offers is ludicrous. And the claim in the lawsuit that guests have to explain their medical condition at the line simply isn't true - they just have to say they have a disability that makes it difficult for them to wait in line, and then they see what accommodation is offered.

The fact that they might not like the accommodation is irrelevant.
 

NotTheOne

Well-Known Member
One of the arguments that Disney had at the time was a free reservation system for front of the line access was available. They no longer have that argument.

Now that may or may not matter depending on other factors.
The free FP+ system was available to everyone for free - it wasn't considered an additional accommodation on top of DAS. Now the LL system is a paid option for everyone, and the disabled are free to pay for that access on top of the Disney provided accommodation, whatever that might be.

FP+ was never deemed by the court to be a disability accommodation.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
FP+ was never deemed by the court to be a disability accommodation.
No, but it was part of Disney’s argument.

“Moreover, Disney argues, the majority of rides have waits of less than 20 minutes, and for those with longer waits, the FastPass+ system allows guests, with planning, to make three reservations each day for premium rides.”
 

NotTheOne

Well-Known Member
No, but it was part of Disney’s argument.

“Moreover, Disney argues, the majority of rides have waits of less than 20 minutes, and for those with longer waits, the FastPass+ system allows guests, with planning, to make three reservations each day for premium rides.”
And they can argue the same thing now, but now it's pay to play for everyone, and since LL isn't an accommodation, they can do that.
 

Splash4eva

Well-Known Member
Personally I don't think anything is going to come out of this. While these people no longer qualify for DAS, Disney has made many alternatives to help those guests.
After fully understanding how DAS works for a single parent with a minor/solo traveler they provide more than enough if not too much & allowing you to meet your party once at front so the person denied DAS can meet or even DAS approved. Whats the argument? Part of a family trip is waiting in line together? Maybe the process is flawed but again if you want DAS stop hiding behind privacy bs & be specific on your condition etc & im confident it will work as intended.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
does everyone agree that Disney should accommodate wheelchairs even though it causes them “operational harm”

I’m assuming Operational harm = reducing the operational efficiency of an attraction.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
does everyone agree that Disney should accommodate wheelchairs even though it causes them “operational harm”

I’m assuming Operational harm = reducing the operational efficiency of an attraction.
Of course but that’s more about access. They set up their queues to allow wheelchairs to pass through. But it’s up to the individual to determine if that’s enough. The people who claim they can’t wait in line in 95 degrees may still opt out. That’s on them. The important piece is that they CAN ride if they want.

Everyone who lost DAS is also able to ride if they (and/or caregivers) want to. If they opt not to because they deem the wait unpleasant, that’s their choice. But it’s not incumbent on Disney to find an acceptable way for that individual to wait.

Sometimes in August I will see the FEA line extend out into the courtyard and say, “not today, Satan!” but I don’t expect any special accommodation. No one tried to keep me from riding. Florida is just hot as balls sometimes.
 

NotTheOne

Well-Known Member
does everyone agree that Disney should accommodate wheelchairs even though it causes them “operational harm”

I’m assuming Operational harm = reducing the operational efficiency of an attraction.
It's not just, or even primarily, about reducing operational efficiency. It's about the ongoing, significant detrimental effects on operations and the effect that has on guest satisfaction, and thus profit.

People in standby having to wait much longer because of an LL packed with DAS users who don't really need it.
People who pay for expedited access not getting what they paid for because of an LL packed with DAS users who don't really need it.
DAS users who can't even wait in the LL because it's packed with DAS users who don't really need it.

Contrary to what you seem to believe, people with disabilities are not due a higher priority than the non-disabled.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom