Rode it for the second time this past weekend. Unfortunately I found it less interesting than I did the first time. Nice ride if the wait is short but once it goes over an hour I think there should be a warning that lowers your expectations.
What if it was the same ride only with the addition of handheld flashlights. Sorta like monsters inc hide and go seek but with flora and fauna that react to our flashlights. There'd be some learning curves like water-proof flashlights, a tethering system to the boat. The type of light (UV) the triggering devices, the receivers. Videos, new lighting, etc. But from a logistics standpoint it would pretty much work with what's already in the ride while providing a quasi-interactive element for the passengers. Having the screens/scenes randomize based on visit would also help. Eh, just spitballing. Pretty lame ride regardless. Oh well.
My daughter and I arrived home to the UK after a two-week visit yesterday.
We managed to snag a fast pass for this ride whilst out there. We really wished we hadn't bothered. The ride was worthy of a second-rate British theme Park. The way this area was hyped and what they actually delivered bares no resemblance to each other.
On a scale of ten ... three.
That is a shame... different people like different things.
Whilst the hype built to epic proportions online for this ride (as well as FOP) it fitted the bill perfectly for me by filling a gap in the AK ride roster - slowing moving indoor dark ride - which is completely lacking in the park.
i agree, thought it lacked plot, every scene felt the same but could easily be improved...I agree with Slapshtick - and you. YES. AK needed a ride like this, but it needed one that was well executed; one that told its story well. It is woefully incomplete. The good news is, that with some storytelling additions they should be able to greatly improve it.
My daughter and I arrived home to the UK after a two-week visit yesterday.
We managed to snag a fast pass for this ride whilst out there. We really wished we hadn't bothered. The ride was worthy of a second-rate British theme Park. The way this area was hyped and what they actually delivered bares no resemblance to each other.
On a scale of ten ... three.
At least you got the FP+. It's definitely not worth an hour or more wait. But a dark ride in the heat of summer with a FP or short wait at rope drop or before closing? I'll take it.
I think that is one of the worst ways, and keep in mind I haven't ridden it nor am I disagreeing with you - just making a point, to describe a ride: "It's a great place to take a nap/break in the A/C and get out of the hot Summer sun!"
To illustrate this:
Haunted Mansion:
People ride this ride because it's a great ride. Yeah, it may get them out of the heat and into the A/C but, mostly, they're riding it, even repeat riders (especially repeat riders) because: The Haunted Mansion is awesome!
Ellen's Universe of Energy (granted, closed now but for contrast): Your first time visitors to WDW are probably staying awake on this ride and trying to take it in. Repeat visitors see it, I'd argue mostly, as a place where they can take a break, cool off from the Summer heat, and maybe sneak in a nap. That speaks volumes about that ride.
When your ride is no more interesting than an air conditioned warehouse with cots and a 45min countdown timer you have a problem - a huge one. I really can't think of another attraction at another, non-Disney, park where people openly talk about getting out of the heat and sneaking a nap in.
Almost as bad: American Adventure. I like American Adventure. I actually don't go into it seeking A/C and a nap but, man, that attraction will lull me to sleep every time.
I think that is one of the worst ways, and keep in mind I haven't ridden it nor am I disagreeing with you - just making a point, to describe a ride: "It's a great place to take a nap/break in the A/C and get out of the hot Summer sun!"
To illustrate this:
Haunted Mansion:
People ride this ride because it's a great ride. Yeah, it may get them out of the heat and into the A/C but, mostly, they're riding it, even repeat riders (especially repeat riders) because: The Haunted Mansion is awesome!
Ellen's Universe of Energy (granted, closed now but for contrast): Your first time visitors to WDW are probably staying awake on this ride and trying to take it in. Repeat visitors see it, I'd argue mostly, as a place where they can take a break, cool off from the Summer heat, and maybe sneak in a nap. That speaks volumes about that ride.
When your ride is no more interesting than an air conditioned warehouse with cots and a 45min countdown timer you have a problem - a huge one. I really can't think of another attraction at another, non-Disney, park where people openly talk about getting out of the heat and sneaking a nap in.
Almost as bad: American Adventure. I like American Adventure. I actually don't go into it seeking A/C and a nap but, man, that attraction will lull me to sleep every time.
I think their point was that it's a bad ride - not that they wanted a place to take a break. When you get around to seeing it, you will agree.
Does anyone really go in an attraction solely to take a break??
No, I think people literally go (went) to Universe of Energy for naps/AC. I know I did. I've heard others on this board who've said the same. I agree that it's a bad ride, though, no matter how you mean the, "It's time for a nap on Universe of Energy"...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.