• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

EPCOT Multiple 3-hour+ waits at EPCOT

Ayla

Well-Known Member
1. Christmas Week has not been as bad post-COVID/price hikes, I thought the era of 220 minute waits was generally over and it seems to be for most parks.

2. None of the other parks besides EPCOT have absurd 3.5 hour waits, especially not for multiple rides.

3. Confused why people are defending it.
No one is defending it. They are telling you facts, which you historically have a hard time accepting.

It's Epcot, on NYE.
 

Pizza Moon

Active Member
Original Poster
No one is defending it. They are telling you facts, which you historically have a hard time accepting.

It's Epcot, on NYE.
I’m referring to X chatter, mostly.

Historically, the gap hasn’t been THIS wide between parks on NYE.

But I was more just reporting the wait times as this is a news discussion board, so if people were in the parks they’d know to stay away from EPCOT if they didn’t want to deal with that level.

Would be interesting to see average wait times from the last few years compared to now.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Historically, the gap hasn’t been THIS wide between parks on NYE.
The wait times at Epcot have always been insane on NYE - so the gap between MK and Epcot is unusual - the wait times at Epcot is not.

All the years run together - I was at WDW for new years from 04/05 until 19/20 - but it was very normal to see guest relations CM’s at MK bus stops telling guests the MK was full.

The secret at the time was… if you can actually get to the front gate - you can get it. I’d take a resort bus over to grand and then take the boat usually.
 

Pizza Moon

Active Member
Original Poster
That definitely wasn't a problem for EPCOT. It had one of the best attraction lineups of any theme park ever.

The content of a ride is what matters; not the ride system. Otherwise every flying coaster is the same ride, every omnimover is the same ride, etc.

The issue with EPCOT was that some of the attractions (although not all) were at least partially outdated by the early 1990s and needed content updates. The park was wildly successful in the 1980s with the original attraction lineup.
Yeah no, it was always our ptov
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Yeah no, it was always our ptov

What?

The thing is that there was no problem with EPCOT (before parts became outdated). I'm not sure when someone created that narrative, but it's not backed up by the evidence. It was very popular in the 1980s and was more successful than most parks Disney has built since.
 
Last edited:

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
The SeaCabs were part of the reason the Living Seas was such a masterpiece (one of Imagineering's all-time triumphs). But they were never intended to be a standalone attraction; it doesn't really make sense to compare them to Nemo one to one. They were only one component of a larger whole.

Nemo is also one of the worst rides at WDW.
I don't consider the omni SeaCab to be a ride. It was once part of what made Living Seas important and in many cases fascinating. We lost the SeaCabs long before Nemo became an item. The Cabs originally gave us the perspective of being surrounded by water and slowly moving through an underwater tunnel that allow us to be part of the underwater experience. Add to that the Hydolaters it became an adventure instead of just feeling like you were looking at a large scale home aquarium. It was one of the most literal immersive attractions ever built. Now it is just if you've seen one fish you've seen them all.

Nemo gave us the Sea Cabs back but basically blocked out the original underwater ride. Instead we got a cartoon show that by association made the real parts of it that still remained just seem like a continuation of the cartoon. Instead of the display of sea life at eye level we got a clown fish. It basically made the place something that wasn't worth seeing as an adult.
 

jah4955

Well-Known Member
I don't consider the omni SeaCab to be a ride. It was once part of what made Living Seas important and in many cases fascinating. We lost the SeaCabs long before Nemo became an item. The Cabs originally gave us the perspective of being surrounded by water and slowly moving through an underwater tunnel that allow us to be part of the underwater experience. Add to that the Hydolaters it became an adventure instead of just feeling like you were looking at a large scale home aquarium. It was one of the most literal immersive attractions ever built. Now it is just if you've seen one fish you've seen them all.

Nemo gave us the Sea Cabs back but basically blocked out the original underwater ride. Instead we got a cartoon show that by association made the real parts of it that still remained just seem like a continuation of the cartoon. Instead of the display of sea life at eye level we got a clown fish. It basically made the place something that wasn't worth seeing as an adult.
As they admitted since it's 1986 opening, it was part of a greater whole (the pavilion far greater than the sum of the parts)

1767539319280.png
 

monothingie

Dynamically Raising Prices Excites Me
Premium Member
I’m referring to X chatter, mostly.

Historically, the gap hasn’t been THIS wide between parks on NYE.

But I was more just reporting the wait times as this is a news discussion board, so if people were in the parks they’d know to stay away from EPCOT if they didn’t want to deal with that level.

Would be interesting to see average wait times from the last few years compared to now.
Maybe shift from appealing to families to Disney adults has consequences?
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
Thank you! I've been waiting 19 years for someone to say that!
Indeed, as I have stated numerous times, adding some light Nemo theming and Turtle Talk to help bring younger demographics into the Living Seas would have been fine. My issue has always been that they turned the whole pavilion into a Finding Nemo playground which barely pays lip service to the actual subject and doesn't even try to appeal to anyone over the age of ten. The most intelligent use of IP in EPCOT history was Circle of Life at The Land. Sure it was character based but it was only one part of a larger whole. It's not like The Land became the Lion King Pavilion as with what Nemo did to Living Seas.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
My issue has always been that they turned the whole pavilion into a Finding Nemo playground which barely pays lip service to the actual subject and doesn't even try to appeal to anyone over the age of ten.
I wouldn’t go that far - the aquariums are still the majority of the pavilion and there is plenty to learn. The room with the plastic sharks is unfortunate.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Do anyone think the living seas pavilion will be destroyed and replaced with some random Disney IP based attraction that has no aquarium or water?

While I love the tranquility of looking at the sea life there, Disney is a business, and business is business and they must focus on building things that have lower maintenance costs that can sell LLs! 😉
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom