Wilt Dasney
Well-Known Member
For all the folks who say most Disney jobs aren't meant to be long-term career positions: Would you really want to go to a park where everyone took that advice to heart?
If every position at Disney was filled with kids fresh out of high school who were treating it as a stepping stone, I think a lot of people would be complaining about how Disney's casting standards have gone out the window.
I don't disagree that the level of education and training needed for these jobs justifies low pay...but the caliber of people Disney prides itself on getting (and people on these forums expect to encounter) pushes back against that.
If you follow this logic, it sounds like Disney is supposed to recruit thousands of people who are expected to be the best of the best in terms of courtesy, guest service and commitment to making "magic" while paying them so little that they naturally move on after 2-3 years, and then turn around and do it all again. How many "Disney quality" people can there be out there to justify that kind of turnover?
In other words, if you really think Disney's frontline CM's should all be getting promoted or leaving the company after a brief sabbatical working on Main Street, then you can't complain when you never see anyone over 18 on Main Street and when you don't get a patented "Have a magical day!" from every one of them.
ETA: Someone mentioned what Universal pays earlier as a defense of Disney's wages. But how many complaints do we read on here about Universal's ostensibly surly/unprofessional/rude employees?
We clearly have a lot of people educated on economic principles here. Maybe someone can explain the economic principle in play behind the idea that Disney should be able to invest the same in human capital as Universal while expecting more in return.
If every position at Disney was filled with kids fresh out of high school who were treating it as a stepping stone, I think a lot of people would be complaining about how Disney's casting standards have gone out the window.
I don't disagree that the level of education and training needed for these jobs justifies low pay...but the caliber of people Disney prides itself on getting (and people on these forums expect to encounter) pushes back against that.
If you follow this logic, it sounds like Disney is supposed to recruit thousands of people who are expected to be the best of the best in terms of courtesy, guest service and commitment to making "magic" while paying them so little that they naturally move on after 2-3 years, and then turn around and do it all again. How many "Disney quality" people can there be out there to justify that kind of turnover?
In other words, if you really think Disney's frontline CM's should all be getting promoted or leaving the company after a brief sabbatical working on Main Street, then you can't complain when you never see anyone over 18 on Main Street and when you don't get a patented "Have a magical day!" from every one of them.
ETA: Someone mentioned what Universal pays earlier as a defense of Disney's wages. But how many complaints do we read on here about Universal's ostensibly surly/unprofessional/rude employees?
We clearly have a lot of people educated on economic principles here. Maybe someone can explain the economic principle in play behind the idea that Disney should be able to invest the same in human capital as Universal while expecting more in return.