This response makes little sense. What is this "any such thing" that you are talking about? And I don't need to look at other threads (although I look at most threads). Looking at this one I get a sense from most members that they don't support you.
Bullying? That's what you are resorting to now? Nice.
How in the world is that bullying?
How about when they build a new ride on the parking lot and another behind Star Tours, actually expanding the park boundaries? I see what you are saying elsewhere, although they are expanding the guest area with TSL and Phase 4 (if that happens).
Indeed. What if we just all call it an Extreme Makeover? Whatever we want to call it, he park should be amazing in four years.
Exactly, that's the biggest thing is that capacity is increasing and RIDES are increasing. From 6 to *at least* 9.
Although one could argue that Disney has already expanded via four theme parks, two water parks, how many hotels, and a shopping district. The name of the game is upkeep and redoing and pulsing what they have now first and looking to keep building latter. For example if they built a fifth gate, without first addressing the crippling problems at DHS, stuck in the early 90, and Epcot which is floundering as a shawdow of its former self, I would say that is a travesty. Look at Dragon ally vs Jaws, that replacing something with a large foot print but small capacity, with a number of new "attractions." Universal is what only 30 years old and already is having to plus every area to keep them relevant, (the huge risk with IP based lands). Disney has expanded in my view to a saturation point and unless they can take care of what they have, I'd rather "expansions" at the current parks instead of another half day park, that will have an identity crisis ten years down the line, that they'll try to fix with band-aids and then have to rehaul the whole park. A la DCA or DHS
I have actually seen several other members state a view similar to your own. And I actually think a rational person would agree that it would've been desirable to remove less for all that is new. But, that doesn't seem to be the way of Disney. They have a view that X-number of attractions ought to be on offer at a specific park so new can just replace old. Imagine if they had that view toward DL its first few decades...you'd be left with MK instead of a park with like 40 rides out in Cali (i.e. Let's just replace Toad with Alice instead of building Alice on top of Toad).
I am done talking to you on this. I really don't care to continue a conversation with someone who is going to try and gain sympathy by making false (and frankly slightly hilarious) accusations.
Agreed. All of the parks need some TLC in a big way, not just band aids. I'm glad they are finally realizing the capacity situation and are addressing that. But also, the continual building of those DVC rooms just keeps saturating the parks with more and more guests. They really need to do something big to make a big difference.
Oh good. Thank you!
I would argue that expanding/ revamping camp minie Mickey into Avatarland will add a huge boost of capacity, the Disney spring changes are a way of better and more efficiently utilizing downtown Disney, The DHs changes are going to be huge to recognize how a park can handle 13 million guests a year more effectively, Soaring' is getting a third theater to address the hugewait times. Hopefully an Epcot project and a frontier land project is on its way soon. But as is I think these projects are big changes. Five years ago their was little to no park. Building activity now its everywhere.
Yep. I'm excited for the new construction none the less and know it will only better the guest experience in time.
AMEN! Thank you very much, this is my line of thinking. Its interesting to hear an industry perspective on it. Thank you!
