Like I pointed out in the other thread. Disney does sometimes still use the old logo. For example the signs at AKL (installed in 2001) say "Walt Disney World Co Vehicles only" and use the old Walt Disney World logo.uklad79 said:They use the old Disneyworld logo. Seems odd that WDI would use an old logo on an offical document. I wonder why they do that.
TurnipHead said:Screamscape is so pathetic that they would steal a picture that was posted here days ago and claim it's exclusive news.![]()
Also, some of the employment paperwork I got in the mail from WDW has the "globe with ears" logo on it--it's still in use, just usually for internal things.peter11435 said:Like I pointed out in the other thread. Disney does sometimes still use the old logo. For example the signs at AKL (installed in 2001) say "Walt Disney World Co Vehicles only" and use the old Walt Disney World logo.
TurnipHead said:Screamscape is so pathetic that they would steal a picture that was posted here days ago and claim it's exclusive news.![]()
wannab@dis said:Well, I think if the blueprint showed actual detail instead of just the title bar area, they might do something. But there's not really any need for the expense of worrying about those two pictures. I'm sure they were ticked, but nothing really was leaked other than the name.
I've done the same, and it was posted in the very next update. Unfortunately, I think he posts just about anything reasonable that he receives.jedimaster1227 said:Screamscape runs on news submitted to the webmaster. He doesn't claim it to be his own news.
everything that he posts has been submitted by someone. I have given him news... This is how I know...
Nope. You'd think wrong.Skellington88 said:I think the person who posted them here submited them to screamscape when they were removed from this site.
There is plenty of proof. It has been confirmed through at least three respected sources.MartyMouse said:I hate to be a naysayer but that doesn’t prove anything. I could whip up some fake blue prints that say Harry Potter / Fantasyland, I need more proof that the Monsters are coming before I’ll believe it.
STR8FAN2005 said:There is plenty of proof. It has been confirmed through at least three respected sources.
I think some people are just in denial.Ausdaddy said:True. And it's been noted that the contractors onsite are referring to the construction as Monsters Inc. It's real.
STR8FAN2005 said:There is plenty of proof. It has been confirmed through at least three respected sources.
MartyMouse said:I hate to be a naysayer but that doesn’t prove anything. I could whip up some fake blue prints that say Harry Potter / Fantasyland, I need more proof that the Monsters are coming before I’ll believe it.
trr313 said:I agree...
marni1971 said:I wish I could show you the proof. It`ll all be out in the open soon enough.
LudwigVonDrake said:I'll prefer to wait until Disney announces it officially.
David Copperfields Magic Underground! That was even on the billboard right at the entrance to MGM...oh well.WDWGuide said:That doesn't necessarily mean all that much, either. There is a decent-sized list of announced additions to the WDWR and other Disney properties that were never built.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.