Nemesis394
Account Suspended
2. Occurring or developing later than desired or expected; delayed.
exactly.
exactly.
Thrawn said:I know that you have an 89 nsx that you drift.
Nemesis394 said:2. Occurring or developing later than desired or expected; delayed.
exactly.
Lauriebar said:I assume that you are refering to this? The way that I read this statement is that Thrawn is making a small joke about your screen name not really saying anything about you because you said something about not judging you on your screen name. He does not say you were born in 89.
Nemesis394 said:im pretty sure that the law on harrassment these days (though harrassment is a bit extreme in this case) is worded in such a way that it doesnt matter how it was intended it matters how it was received
nsxdrift_89 said:Thrawn accused me of being a sixteen year old, who street races (which is illegal). how insulting is that. as a matter of fact, i am at the top of my class, with a 4.5 GPA. i would rather not be judged based on my username.
nsxdrift_89 said:maybe you should have some common courtesy towards people
nsxdrift_89 said:Thrawn accused me of being a sixteen year old, who street races (which is illegal). how insulting is that. as a matter of fact, i am at the top of my class, with a 4.5 GPA. i would rather not be judged based on my username.
If WDW wanted to or needed to expand the monorail line, they too could get the funding. However as I have stated an unknown number of times in this thread: Buses remain the most (and only) efficient way to quickly transport guests at WDW.nsxdrift_89 said:If LAS VEGAS can get the funding to build a monorail connecting the strip, and a Casino chain is considering expanding their PM/Monorail across the other side of the stip, then why can't Disney do it. MGM is a publicly traded company..... they are considering doing it. Also, they base much of their income on the same concepts as WDW. Both companines want people going to their other properties and spending more money on merchandise, hotel rooms, meals, and entertainment.
nsxdrift_89 said:If LAS VEGAS can get the funding to build a monorail connecting the strip, and a Casino chain is considering expanding their PM/Monorail across the other side of the stip, then why can't Disney do it. MGM is a publicly traded company..... they are considering doing it. Also, they base much of their income on the same concepts as WDW. Both companines want people going to their other properties and spending more money on merchandise, hotel rooms, meals, and entertainment.
peter11435 said:If WDW wanted to or needed to expand the monorail line, they too could get the funding. However as I have stated an unknown number of times in this thread: Buses remain the most (and only) efficient way to quickly transport guests at WDW.
Not true. I am not going to get into specifics here, but if you do a thread search you will find detailed explantions (most be invero) about the topic. The fact is that any form of transportation that relies on a track can not be efficient to serve WDW's needs.Nemesis394 said:aHAH but any system of transportation, if implemented correctly and strategically, can be efficient!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.