Tom Morrow
Well-Known Member
No, they built "Tattooine Except Not" so they would not be limited to elements from Tattooine but retain a similar look. I'm not sure where you're getting "bombed out" from. There's evidence of some fights, not a huge battle. It's also grossly dismissive to suggest that people don't care about the "war" element of Star Wars. Isn't that a major reason why we all wish they hadn't cut the live entertainment? Where we would have seen fighting? Also, while not a superbly executed ride, everything about MFSR is light hearted and goofy, certainly not "grim" (though IMO it would have benefited from a more serious tone).this is a popular argument that makes very little sense in the shadow of star tours - a ride that perfectly encapsulates the fun and adventure of the “star wars” universe without getting bogged down by the grim hypotheticals of a fictional universe. the same goes for the “indiana jones” ride; that show could be a much more dramatic and serious affair, but the team in charge understood what made it work from the “disneyland” perspective and incorporated those elements respectively.
if we’re still talking about this from the “harry potter” perspective, disney built the equivalent of hogwarts, post-“deathly hallows” battle. it’s not really fun or mysterious, just bombed-out and depleted.
And since we're once again (wrongly) using WWoHP as some sort of holy grail of theme park design, let's not forget that Universal made a massive misstep with Gringotts. The fun adventure that perfectly encapsulates the magical delight of the IP was right there in the material. All they had to do was make a whimsical ride through the vaults on the cart system we already knew about, yet they squandered it and made it take place during the most significant event of the bank's entire history and we spend our time shuffling from scene to scene, escaping grim death instead of just riding the rails having fun.
Last edited: