spacemt354
Chili's
I never said it was a long term thing. But none of these discussed solutions are, because even if you get a no name actor to start, eventually they will want the big bucks once they become popular. And to me, it has no bearing on my life how much Disney spends on their films. I don't see a dime of it, this is just a discussion of how to bring the budget down. In the exercise of possible options there are multiple paths to bring these budgets down and that's all my point was about.And sometimes actors do take pay cuts in order to make films, but that is a not a guarantee that will happen for every big name actor and for every film. Jackman did it for Logan in order to secure an R rating for the film from the studio. But again its not guaranteed that all actors will do that for every film. If a studio gets known in the industry for trying to get your actors to always take a pay cut you don't get the big name talent.
Also this can't be a long term thing, you can't ask an actor to take a pay cut for a part that is going to be in 3-6+ movies. Actors tend to want to get paid out for multi-picture deals that includes points on the back end. Its just how Hollywood works, its not unique to Marvel. So yeah you might be able to get an actor to do one movie for a pay cut, but if you want that actor to come back for future films for the same character you're gonna have to pay.
And trust me I know that actors are making more than most people make in their entire lives. I really wish most didn't make the money they do make because they aren't worth it most of the time. But we don't live in that world, we live in the world where you get a big name actor ending up making $100M or more per film with a deal for both front end and back end paychecks.
Not sure if you've seen the slate of movies coming up, but a lot of these aren't going to be doable with a majority of shots on physical sets. Maybe they can go back to that after 2026.
Also they are slowing down the releases which should give the VFX teams a break.