Disneydreamer16
Member
I know we arent supposed to be doing this but we have a family of 5 staying in a room at pop century. Does anyone know if this is going to pose a problem with the magical express tickets? Any info would be helpful...thanks
I don't actually see the big chunk at risk. Worst case is they ask you too leave, and in that case you get a refund on those unused hotel days... so you end up in a cheaper offsite hotel. Not the end of world now is it?
This question has been asked several times lately. For DME to transfer your luggage, at least one person from your party must ride the bus.With DME, is it possible to have DME take your luggage, but not you? We'd like to rent a car at the airport, as we've heard it's much cheaper, but we'd like Disney to handle the luggage, as that seems very convenient.
If you put your DME tags on your luggage, but don't check in with the DME when you arrive, will they still take your bags to your room?
Thanks.
What people are getting a disservice? And what harard are we talking about? Sure you cram an extra person in your room the odds of a fight over which TV channel to watch or who is next in the bathroom... but lets be honest here, it ain't like you cramming people into a phone booth.
I can accept the goody goody that says its wrong because its against the rules, I don't agree with them but if they want to live by other peoples rules let them have fun living that way... but trying to claim it is somehow a hazard? If the amount of space required for x number of people were any true hazard half of the apartments and hotels in New York city would be shut down.
I can accept the goody goody that says its wrong because its against the rules, I don't agree with them but if they want to live by other peoples rules let them have fun living that way... but trying to claim it is somehow a hazard? If the amount of space required for x number of people were any true hazard half of the apartments and hotels in New York city would be shut down.
The goody goody? It is against the law to overcrowd a hotel room past its stated occupancy. You can be evicted without restitution.What people are getting a disservice? And what harard are we talking about? Sure you cram an extra person in your room the odds of a fight over which TV channel to watch or who is next in the bathroom... but lets be honest here, it ain't like you cramming people into a phone booth.
I can accept the goody goody that says its wrong because its against the rules, I don't agree with them but if they want to live by other peoples rules let them have fun living that way... but trying to claim it is somehow a hazard? If the amount of space required for x number of people were any true hazard half of the apartments and hotels in New York city would be shut down.
Not to mention extra noisy.....those walls can be veeeerrryyy thin.I agree. I am not really big on reporting every little thing, but honesty (although cliche) really is the best in these situations. Especially in the value rooms, don't cram too many people in there. It won't be good for you, your family, or your collective sanity regardless of how old they are. Past that, its just plain wrong. Don't propogate the cycle. And we wonder why prices always are going up.
If there were an emergency than required an evacuation and you had more people in your room, there could be a problem. Not a "Oh no there's a fire... WHAT?! FIVE people in your room?! We're charging you extra!" But more along the lines of taking roll call for the families that are there. If there are undocumented people in the rooms, then they will go unnoticed if they were to somehow get locked in the room, or fall and injure themselves on the way out.
Maybe you could look into the family suites at the All Stars? That way it's not an extra room, just a bit more of an extra charge... and you can fit 6 people legally without worrying through your vacation about getting caught.
As far as the apartments and hotels in NYC, Yes they do get shut down for over occupancy when they are caught. In most cases it is not caught until there is a tragedy and people are hurt or killed. Belle
My thought on this issue is this. Ok a family of 5 with a child 2 and under can stay in a value room. But now, if every family of 5 even if they had 3 little ones..say 4,5,6..they use more towels & more water than a family of 4 (more showers, face washing, teeth brushing, toilet flushing etc). If everyone did this, those hidden costs would start adding up..meaning Disneys costs would start adding up..which gets passed on to customers...which means the values become less of a value to the honest customers putting four people in a room. Ok, so most of you are probably thinking "well, yes, but those costs are minimal Disney can eat the cost" But I think thats how it hurts other people.
I am not the morality police, I'm just saying I wouldn't do it.
I think the bottom line here is that it is just plain wrong. You may justify it in your own mind, but at the end of the day, you're still wrong.I might agree if Disney gave me a discount when I checked in with only 3 people instead of 4 but the last time I checked they charged the same for 1 person in a room as for 4. So a group that stuff 5 in a room every once in a while is really just equalling out the costs of the rooms where only 3 people are staying.
What if everyone that went to Disney had the same outlook? I would suspect that the conditions at the resorts would be horrendous. Overcrowded pools, food courts jammed beyond their capacity, housekeeping unable to keep up with demand for linens and towels, buses unable to keep up with demand etc.So a group that stuff 5 in a room every once in a while is really just equalling out the costs of the rooms where only 3 people are staying.
The goody goody? It is against the law to overcrowd a hotel room past its stated occupancy. You can be evicted without restitution.
As far as it being a hazard, well, it is. Consider if there were seven people in a room designed for only four. In the event of a fire in the middle of the night, evacuating extra bodies from a space that is not designed to accomodate them is dangerous. What if everyone in the hotel had your outlook and just bypassed the rules? Instead of the allowed number of people trying to evacuate through a given number of fire escapes, you could now have twice the number or more. The results would most likely be disasterous.
The rules are there for a specific reason, not to make the guests life more difficult and not for just anyone to disregard at their lesiure.
In your mind it is wrong. I accept that. But my comment about 5 people in some room and 3 in other equalling out is quite correct. Most people don't cram 5 people in a room and alot of people don't have 4 people in a room they have less, often only 2. So deal with reality and not your fantasy world please.I think the bottom line here is that it is just plain wrong. You may justify it in your own mind, but at the end of the day, you're still wrong.
What if everyone that went to Disney had the same outlook? I would suspect that the conditions at the resorts would be horrendous. Overcrowded pools, food courts jammed beyond their capacity, housekeeping unable to keep up with demand for linens and towels, buses unable to keep up with demand etc.
There are specific reasons behind every law, rule and regulation. Those laws, rules and regulations are not open for negotiation.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.