Lee said:I heard at least 50 people wanted it.
mkt said:for that role, they are especially strict. I don't think 5ft 1/2in will be a problem (especially with Disney measuring people on average .5-1in shorter than their doctor says they are), provided the weight is around 100 lbs.
She does have to be at least 18 to do this... so odds are, she's gonna be to tall when she's old enough.
Try instilling a new dream. Perhaps a princess?
WDWScottieBoy said:50 people is a lot?
I suspect that Wardrobe has an upper and lower limit of costumes for specific faces as most people do go up and down in weight. I've seen characters looking a little fuller in the face on some days than othersChape19714 said:For being a Face Charactor (i mean a friend of one) you MUST fit the exact costume Disney has. Disney will not change the size of a costume for a face charactor. so, you must be the right size, or sorry, it won't happen. You will not be considered any further if you cannot fit into the costume (whether too big or too small) Non-face charactors, such as those with a mask (mickey, minnie etc.) i there is a limit, but there are varations of the costume. (mickey can't be 6'10"!)
That's what i've been told.
see the numbers before you tell your daughter no.
barnum42 said:I . I've seen characters looking a little fuller in the face on some days than others
Tink is not covered under AEA. They are covered by no union at all because they are classified as Office & Technical Hourly. I kid you not. And since O&T is has no union, they have no contract. Which i always found funny since you would think that it would be classified as a Stunt Position. Maybe one day the AEA will raise a stink about it.mkt said:for this role, it's the size. Appearance has very little to do with it, since it's not cast from the character department, but is in fact, a stunt role through the Actors Equity Association.
I've flown on stage before and I'm definately too tall and broad to play Tink.Miss Bell said:I always thought it was the flying aspect of this character that caused the limited height restriction, not the costume size.
Hmm... this is kinda hard to believe. I would think they would have some type of drag / braking device installed in the zip line for safety purposes. It could easily be used to speed up / slow down Tink and give allowances for different weights.Disney Duggan said:A few years ago when I took the Backstage Magic tour, I remember our tour guide talking about the requirements for Tinker Bell. She didn't say anything about height, but she did stress that weight was extremely important. If Tink was too light, she wouldn't make it all the way across and if she was too heavy, she would zip across too fast. I don't remember what the ideal weight was, but I think it was around 100 lbs.
Indeed. O&T has no union, no contract, and all the good and bad things that come of that. (Like Management can get rid of you really easily if you cause trouble for them) I can understand how some people who work in the parks are under O&T, but Tink? Thats insane. Utterly insane.boo52 said:. They are covered by no union at all because they are classified as Office & Technical Hourly. I kid you not. And since O&T is has no union, they have no contract.
It amazes me also. I wonder why though that Equity hasn't made a fuss about it. I mean the job description perfectly fits the role of a stunt performer. i don't get it.PhotoDave219 said:Indeed. O&T has no union, no contract, and all the good and bad things that come of that. (Like Management can get rid of you really easily if you cause trouble for them) I can understand how some people who work in the parks are under O&T, but Tink? Thats insane. Utterly insane.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.