General Grizz
New Member
Being number one after nearly 25 years is pretty darn good, though. . . that could indicate per-trip rerideability.
I AM GOING TO DIE.JeffH said:I hope they make the area in front of the castle a sitting only (or sitting kids only) section with a good view (and enforce it). If you try to sit up front now, you are too close and the front of the stage block the view, so you stand and then everyone behind you who are sitting has to stand and before you know it everyone is standing and the most important audience for the show (the kids) get a good view of adult butts:-(
I've always hated standing, and have always wished that they'd add some sort of seating in the 360 theatres. Unlike Canada and China, TK really doesn't address the 'back' screens very much, so seeing behind you isn't that important.
Nevertheless, I've always thought that TK was a good show and an improvement on the 'simple' 360 theatre concept. It melded perfectedly into the theming of Tomorrowland...a theming that I'd hoped they would continue to develop, by transforming the CoP into a 50's style flying saucer and changing the show inside to reflect a Jules Verne history and future review...living in his time, his view of 50 years later, 100 years and 500 years.
But if TK has to go, then here's a great idea, A Stitch in Time!!! They replace 9eye with a time travelling Stitch who wreaks havok back in time, driving a robot that sounds a lot like Robin Williams crazy with his escapades. Fill the auditorium with benches for the throngs to sit on, and this would present a perfect opportunity for the night-light-toy carts to sell trinkets before and during the show. And at the end of the show, Stitch flys around with a Kodak camera taking pictures of everyone, which you can buy for only $16.99 if you circle around to the Buzz photo store. {Now why can't they sell a small Buzz postcard picture in a little paper frame for about $7.99??? $16.99 for a picture on the Buzz ride is way too much!!!}
COProgressFan said:Just out of curiosity, why do you think the "average guest wants a quick thrill". Do average guests really say that? I highly doubt people go to Disney World to get a quick thrill. I think the average guest gets a quick thrill on newer rides because that is what Disney gives them (for whatever reason, cost, etc.). And sure, people may like the quick thrills but that doesn't mean they wouldn't also love a longer attraction that keeps their attention, is funny, entertaining, has heart, etc.
CoP
I'd still think it would be #1, though. But it's that balance that you and Pixie described that keeps it #1: VARIETY (singing bears to ghosts to a space mountain to Buzz to a Hall of Presidents) creates something for everyone.basas said:I think it is a large factor. Alot of people who only have time to visit one theme park visit the MK..why? Because they like the rides and atmosphere at MK the best out of all 4 WDW parks. You'll aslo find alot of these people will say their favorite attraction is Space, Splash, or Thunder. If those three rides wern't there- i don't think the MK would be near as popular.
basas said:True but i'd bet a large portion of SSE riders ride simply because its the first thing they see apon entering and therefore they immediately ride...and how many come out wanting to jump back in line again? My guess is not too many (although they might enjoy it).
IMO- thrill rides will almost always do well at any park because a large percentage of visitors simply want a good thrill ride. More in-depth rides can also do as well as long as they're properly done and guests enjoy it (ex: Haunted Mansion, POTC, GMR).
Hilarious post! Thanks for the laugh.GymLeaderPhil said:Are you kidding me? Swivel chairs are SO five minutes ago. The future is in rocking chairs!![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.