el_super
Well-Known Member
Which feels kind of odd, massive discounts for locals but not many discounts to entice non locals to stay longer. Their words indicate they want more tourists but their actions indicate they still prefer locals.
I don't think these two ideas are incongruent really. The last three day ticket (which I guess wasn't just so cal) was really part of an effort to convince locals that they didn't need to have an annual pass. Selling 3 days instead of 10+ helps preserve capacity and helps them manage crowds a little better.
On the other end of the spectrum, if the Grand is still selling out at $700 a night, their ability to attract more tourists may not result in any direct revenue increase. They're already hitting the capacity for tourists they can house.
If what the execs have been saying for the last few years (both Iger and Chapek) really do signal a change in direction for the parks as a whole, it would make sense over the next few years that services and infrastructure that were directly tied to the rampaging AP crowds would start to be dialed back, so that additional capacity for higher spending guests can be added. This could be as simple as removing parking lots for more hotel rooms/villas.
You can't start removing parking lots until the AP crowds are controlled though.