I personally (and yes this is a personal post) feel that Futureworld at EPCOT should not be nostalgic. Yes we all miss TT, Horizons, and WOM but it was meant to be a continuing cutting edge presentation ala a "worlds fair". The mere stagnation speaks to its level of failure for me.
WS...well I get the classic staticness of it. Would be nice to see the areas left for expansion used but I would embrace some groundbreaking new technology in Futureworld...I long for the day when I walk into and attraction and my breath is taken away once again. Maybe I have gotten too jaded for that to even happen but DANG I sure miss that feeling!!!
Yea American Adventure.How about the American Adventure & Canada?
So do I, but, China was updated as well.Yea American Adventure.
I wouldn't include O' Canada. It's been modernized with Martin Short.. But, I prefer it that way. :3
Well, it appears that we, on the boards, are burnt out, but, the general public doesn't seem to have had their fill yet.It is caused by multiple factors.
1.) People actually wanted the Backlot Tour gone for years. The fact is the Attraction was going done hill for years. That is not the case for Maelstrom
2.) People already said Frozen really doesn't fit Norway unlike Maelstrom.
3.) I think people are suffering from Frozen Burnout based on how Disney is milking frozen.
Well, it appears that we, on the boards, are burnt out, but, the general public doesn't seem to have had their fill yet.
Well, it appears that we, on the boards, are burnt out, but, the general public doesn't seem to have had their fill yet.
Didn't know that. I never go there, I think it's boring. At least Canada's has some comedy with MartinSo do I, but, China was updated as well.
I have noticed a lot more attention devoted to the closing of Maelstrom more than the closing of the Studio Backlot Tour. My question is:
Why was the attention to the farewell so different?
Is it because the Backlot had run its course?
Is it the surprise that Maelstrom is closing? (although it had been rumored for months)
Is it the replacement attractions?
For me, I think it is a combo of all of the above. The Maelstrom was never a ride with too long of a wait, nor was the Studio Backlot Tour. You can argue that both rides needed change, but I find it somewhat odd that Backlot (which I always made a point to ride every trip to WDW, and I enjoyed it) didn't receive the same kind of goodbye.
Thoughts?
Honestly, as much as I am an EPCOT "traditionalist" and a huge nostalgia fan,.....
I like Frozen in Norway.
The entire pavilion isn't getting totally redone, just the ride. It will bring some attention to the pavilion and Ws In general.
And you can't use the "fiction vs reality" argument because most of the Malestrom ride was based in fiction anyway.
Well, Arendelle is inspired by Norway/Norwegian themes. It fits better than say, The Lion King would have. Or pretty much any other potential replacement.Yes but at least the legend of trolls (though fiction) are part of Norways culture in some way. Frozen has nothing to do with Norway's culture.
The saddest thing about Backlot was that it was allowed to linger for so long after the park quit being a working movie studio. To think there are thousands of people who visited the park between 2004 and 2014 who never had any idea that it was ever anything more than "The Catastrophe Canyon Ride".
Bee gone.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.