EricsBiscuit
Well-Known Member
This rumor got me thinking “well, if they add LotR I might as well know what’s going on” so I started and got hooked hahaWow, that is a deep dive
This rumor got me thinking “well, if they add LotR I might as well know what’s going on” so I started and got hooked hahaWow, that is a deep dive
Well I guess that settles that rumor.. I imagine they could always sell the rights to Comcast if they really wanted it.Embracer buys theme park rights to Lord of the Rings, Hobbit IP
Swedish gaming and entertainment company Embracer Group has bought the theme park rights to J.R.R. Tolkien's intellectual property (IP).blooloop.com
Universal would always likely have licensed the rights, so this just changes the licensor. If anything, this might make a deal more likely as a new owner will want to capitalize on their purchase.Well I guess that settles that rumor.. I imagine they could always sell the rights to Comcast if they really wanted it.
The company...
Embracer Group - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Whose most well-known brand is...
Dark Horse Comics - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I wonder how much they paid?Embracer buys theme park rights to Lord of the Rings, Hobbit IP
Swedish gaming and entertainment company Embracer Group has bought the theme park rights to J.R.R. Tolkien's intellectual property (IP).blooloop.com
After reading it, I’m not sure that really matters. They bought all the rights not just theme park rights and they aren’t a company that’s going to develop theme parks. They’re a video, card and board game company for the most part. They also own Dark Horse Comics which is interesting.
They could very well turn around and license the rights to a company that actually builds parks.
As much as I love Springfield because it really got an emotional reaction the first time I walked through, I would welcome an overhaul.If Universal teams up with them, couldn't this also be a way to change Marvel Superhero Island into a Dark Horse Comics overlay instead? I know DHC doesn't have nearly the name recognition as Marvel or DC but if they also let the Simpson's contract lapse, they would get rid of all Disney-owned licenses. I know they'd still need to go through Netflix for Stranger Things, but DHC does the Stranger Things comics as well.
Why would Universal give up a cheap, popular license for a likely more expensive, less popular license?If Universal teams up with them, couldn't this also be a way to change Marvel Superhero Island into a Dark Horse Comics overlay instead? I know DHC doesn't have nearly the name recognition as Marvel or DC but if they also let the Simpson's contract lapse, they would get rid of all Disney-owned licenses. I know they'd still need to go through Netflix for Stranger Things, but DHC does the Stranger Things comics as well.
They could do that. They have absolutely no reason or incentive to do that.If Universal teams up with them, couldn't this also be a way to change Marvel Superhero Island into a Dark Horse Comics overlay instead? I know DHC doesn't have nearly the name recognition as Marvel or DC but if they also let the Simpson's contract lapse, they would get rid of all Disney-owned licenses. I know they'd still need to go through Netflix for Stranger Things, but DHC does the Stranger Things comics as well.
I didn't say they would or should...but could if they wanted to get out and separate from Disney.Why would Universal give up a cheap, popular license for a likely more expensive, less popular license?
I didn't say they would or should...but could if they wanted to get out and separate from Disney.
This woulda coulda has existed the entire time. It’s nothing new.I didn't say they would or should...but could if they wanted to get out and separate from Disney.
*Separate* from Disney? Their whole schtick is that they are WDW's 5th and 6th gates.I didn't say they would or should...but could if they wanted to get out and separate from Disney.
Who has mastered the synergy game?*Separate* from Disney? Their whole schtick is that they are WDW's 5th and 6th gates.
That was the case for years.. Apparently someone decided that it was time to cash in perhaps?I always thought the Tolkien estate had all the rights to LOTR.
The estate hasn't had the film right since the 60s when Tolkien himself sold them to United Artists (partly to prevent Disney from ever getting them). UA then in turn sold them to Saul Zaentz, which is still the holder to this day. The WB films were licensed from SZ. Even more confusing the Hobbit film rights are also Zaentz but the distribution rights are held by MGM.I always thought the Tolkien estate had all the rights to LOTR.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.