The fireworks going off right above our heads was unforeseen. Having some kids take a peek at them is really not a big deal. No one got hurt, and no one even cared. We were in 20 lineups all day and you act as if this is just a routine thing that I do in every line up. It was kids seeing a glimpse of some fireworks, relax man.
You seem to change your story to suit your agenda and try to convince everyone that you know how everyone you pass in line feels about it. There's many posters on this very thread explaining that what you did was wrong but your response appears to be "that they have too much time on their hands" or "are overthinking things because nobody in the line cared".
As well as insinuating that a person in a wheelchair is somehow 'interesting' if they can get up and step into the ride vehicle (which you've conveniently chosen to not comment on or try to justify again), you're now seemingly trying to play the victim here because people don't agree with you. One post you say you passed 60 - 70 people to get to your family on Pirates, a few posts late you're changing the story to you met your family at the turn in the queue and just stepped over the rope. Which version of the story is true and why does it change? If there were 60 - 70 people between the end of the queue and where you jumped the rope to join your family (meaning you technically didn't pass them), then how do you know that none of them were bothered?
You now appear to be trying the other method of diverting the topic at hand by trying to change the story to comparing it to a toilet emergency. You've also changed it to appear that it's about kids wanting to see fireworks as though people questioning your behaviour are supposed to feel bad because kids are involved even though that has nothing to do with your philosophy on line etiquette or park rules even. This is proven by your justification of sending your family ahead in Pirates whilst you visit the toilet. No doubt we're expected to understand that people need the toilet now an then as though that's the issue people have with what you did, again it's irrelevant and is simply about you thinking it's ok to send your family ahead. You try diverting the attention away from the act you did by changing the conversation to how you don't 'push past people' even though the term was meant to signify passing people in line with nobody seriously thinking you were grabbing people and physically moving them out of the way in a violent manner.
It's like listening to a politician speaking the way you've morphed this story into something it's not. Let's compare it to legitimate reasons to leave the line. Let's keep repeating the ages of the young children who just wanted to view the fireworks and hope people see that it's about young kids and feel sorry for them. Let's say that nobody got hurt, despite nobody claiming otherwise. Let's say people responding have too much time on their hands to discuss it, despite you being the one posting most about it and making excuses rather than perhaps accepting your part in it and maybe saying that you'd just not thought it through.
You seemingly want to detract from the points made and not apologise for your insinuation about people in wheelchairs, despite several people clearly giving examples of why people are offended by what you said. If you want to have the view that people in wheelchairs may be using them when they don't have to and that there's nothing wrong with sending your family ahead of you whilst you do x, y or z, then post that and have the courage to stand by your convictions. You'd probably get more respect doing that than trying to change the story or bring in factors that are irrelevant to your actions and try to make out that you're the victim here.
As for people needing to relax or having too much time on their hands by responding, I don't see anyone suggesting that it's the worst crime in the world or that they lose sleep over your actions. It's more that it's frankly amazing that you don't seem to show any accountability to your 'philosophy' and people are just trying to get their point across and hope you see it from their perspective. The fact nobody seems to be defending you and numerous posters have criticised your actions, would cause most people to self evaluate their actions and think perhaps nobody being on my side may mean that perhaps I'm wrong on some level. Instead it's deflecting and blaming factors that are irrelevant. That's all that's being said really but I'm sure you'll just keep insisting "it was for young children", "nobody got hurt" and "nobody cared except a guy in a wheelchair who interestingly could walk".
