TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
I’ll let you know when it hits Disney+ haha.Ignoring sales, go see it, and report back.
I’ll let you know when it hits Disney+ haha.Ignoring sales, go see it, and report back.
Nah it did better with the Lightyear name then it would have as an original IP. Speaking financially. Critically maybe it would have done better disconnected from Toy Story, however if you change Buzz Lightyear to Lunar Larry the movie still has the same issues.If the movie wasn't Lightyear, and instead was a backstory for Space Mountain, perhaps it would have done better as just a sci-fi movie.
I still think it was good. The references to Buzz the toy's characteristics was great. Ignoring sales, go see it, and report back.
I guess I might be among such folks but my opinion was that the opening wasn’t as bad as people were making it out to be. But since the box office has fallen off in the second weekend I would agree that now calling Lightyear a bomb is actually appropriate.Funny how all of the Lightyear apologists after the first weekend have dropped off the face of the earth from this thread…
I think you’re totally misreading my feelings on this. I honestly don’t care about Lightyear at all and what it does or doesn’t do at the box office. Now ask me about Elvis and I’ll have a fiery response. But getting back to Lightyear, several of us only pointed out that it bombed and that seemed to trigger several folks in this forum.
That being said, there is no point in spinning it: Lightyear is a flop. Unfortunately, since Soul, Luca and Turning Red were sent straight to streaming and Encanto had an absurdly short theatrical window, we really don't have much to compare Lightyear with to assess how much of the underperformance was due to animated movies underperforming in general during the pandemic.
The highest grossing animated release since March 2020 is Sing 2 at $162 million domestically. Rise of Gru is likely to beat that (if it doesn't, that will send off alarms across the industry regarding animated features).
The sad thing is, it was done years ago, way better but Pixar refuses to acknowledge it.Exactly how many levels of suspending disbelief do we need ? A cartoon movie about an imaginary character that was the basis for an imaginary toy line with abandonment issues that enthralled a young protagonist? Does that make this far-far-far-fetched?
Seriously whoever greenlit this project needs to be taken to the woodshed.
It’ll find it on Disney+, just like all their other recent movies.A true shame the film didn’t find its audience in theaters as it’s a solid flick and can have made for a cool way to pull the Buzz Lightyear rides into a more futuristic look.
I told my buddy that's probably his best bet for him and his son. Either that or see it at the Drive in when it's paired with Minions.It’ll find it on Disney+, just like all their other recent movies.
This is my impression of the two movies as well. I suspect Turning Red will also benefit a lot from streaming as it will be more conducive to its intended audience finding the film.Turning Red is the definition of a movie that, while not pleasing some old fuddies, pleases a lot of the modern generation (very important I think since social media fuels a lot of popularity).
Buzz doesn't seem to please anyone.
And yet the very woke Doctor Strange 2 with the two moms scene made $250M more than Doctor Strange 1.
It’s a shame. It would have been a great time in A/C with popcorn and fake butter.Marvel's Doctor Strange 2 is a very different film than the consumer marketplace that Pixar deals in.
Doctor Strange 2 was rated PG-13 and was marketed with visuals and subject matter that was clearly aimed at teens and adults looking for a scary superhero movie. I love that gay representation is being included in more films aimed at young adults, so long as it's not pandering and flows naturally and is key to the plot. I don't have any problem with a teenager seeing a movie like that, and I imagine most parents don't either.
But teenage boys and young men have loved that kind of gory and violent stuff since the 1950's. Doctor Strange 2 was not a children's cartoon produced by a family-film studio like Pixar.
I think it's obvious now from the box office results that far too many American parents had a problem with letting their 8 year olds go see Lightyear. A family-film studio needs to release movies lots of parents will allow their children to see. Lightyear wasn't one of those films.
Disney's Lightyear Was The Only Real Loser At The Box Office This Weekend - SlashFilm
Lightyear fell all the way to number five in its second weekend with just $17.6 million.www.slashfilm.com
I agree with all of this, but that I was only mildly interested in Turning Red (which, considering I’m a redhead, is sayin something) and when I did watch it, i thought it was cute but I am definitely waaaaaay older than their target demographic.This is my impression of the two movies as well. I suspect Turning Red will also benefit a lot from streaming as it will be more conducive to its intended audience finding the film.
Personally, I was very interested to see Turning Red and watched it as soon as it became available on Disney+ as it at least seemed like an interesting and fresh idea. Can't say that Lightyear interests me in the least, and I don't think I will probably even watch it on Disney+. It does seem to me like it could have been a hit if they really nailed the execution, but it also seems like a film no-one was asking for.
Will be honest and say that for me the franchise was already seeming a bit tired by Toy Story 4.
That was the only reason I saw it as wellI was only mildly interested in Turning Red (which, considering I’m a redhead, is sayin something)
This is grabbing attention now. People actually want to see this;
View attachment 648862
Lightyear who / what? Don't remember it.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.