Large Piece Falls off Monorail - Being Evacuated

raven

Well-Known Member
Not to get off topic here but aren't all of those pointed tips on the castle lightening rods?

Same with the "flag poles" with the similar but not quite American flags on the roofs of Main Street, USA?
Yes they are. Due to all of the lightning that Central Florida receives, they are placed there to try and divert strikes away from guests.
 

RustySpork

Oscar Mayer Memer
Yes they are. Due to all of the lightning that Central Florida receives, they are placed there to try and divert strikes away from guests.

They help provide a better path to ground to reduce fire and electrical circuit damage risk. Unless these new gondolas are also full faraday cages they won't offer any form of lightning protection and will have to be shut down whenever there's a storm in the area and also when it's very windy, just as the Sky Ride at Busch Gardens is.
 

raven

Well-Known Member
They help provide a better path to ground to reduce fire and electrical circuit damage risk. Unless these new gondolas are also full faraday cages they won't offer any form of lightning protection and will have to be shut down whenever there's a storm in the area and also when it's very windy, just as the Sky Ride at Busch Gardens is.
So it will kinda be like trying to manage a farm in Venice, huh? ;)
 

Nubs70

Well-Known Member
Wrong. Disney maintenance works around the clock covering 3 shifts on nearly every attraction.

If this is the case, WDW has a dramatically flawed maintenance transformation. The monorail system operates maybe 18 hours a day, leaving a net 6 hours per day for maintenance.

I work in an mechanically intricate process that operates 24 hours a day 360 days per year with 80 year old equipment. This facility operates above 93% OEE and is allotted 8-10 hours maintenance downtime per month.
 

s8film40

Well-Known Member
Just to give some perspective, these are some pretty old vehicles and it's a wonder they run as well as they do. These trains were designed in a style way ahead of its time and we often forget just how old they are. The ad below highlights what modern vehicles looked like at the time these things were manufactured. Also if these were street vehicles in FL in two years they would qualify for "antique" license plates.
IMG_6039.JPG
 

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member
Hear me out, read my full post or don't quote it.

This week in FL we had a ton of huge thunderstorms. So, maybe lightning hit the track and didn't cause any noticeable damage, but did cause some damage. After that Monorail Blue went over it and the friction (a crack or metal jutting out from potential lightning strike) pulled off parts and started an electrical fire. That's my conjecture and I know absolutely nothing other than what has been given as fact. I base this off the fact that monorails are notorious for electrical fires. Over the years thank God there have been few. But when they pioneered the first daily operating monorail in the Western Hemisphere at Disneyland, poor Bob Gurr (an incredible Imagineer who has worked on many Disney and UNI projects) had encountered electrical fire after electrical fire. There is a great documentary on engineering the monorails on YouTube. As for maintenance, on my last trip a month and a half ago (I went to the Asia for a month since then) they said something like 2 monorails were being completely refurbed, one just got a new paint job, and another new bloomers (the bags between the coaches). So I guess they're maintaining them well. If they didn't these things would not have lasted almost 30 years. That is why I think this was caused by damage to the track, sustained from lightning from the many storms lately, that caused friction, igniting an electrical fire and tearing parts off. For those who say, "why didn't another monorail have this problem, they go on the same track?" That is a fair point; however, each monorail is unique and has many idiosyncrasies that make them so. Maybe a certain configuration of a system from the last refurbishment positioned a part in a way that it would trigger this event.
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
Uh, if round-the-clock maintenance was actually performed then why shouldn't they be? Not too much to ask that people do their jobs, is it? Not saying that things don't break down but when parts fly off a vehicle for no apparent reason then obviously someone missed a maintenance detail.
There is nothing about that statement that is obvious. The picture tells me that something happened and it almost positively wasn't because of lack of maintenance. I don't know what, you don't know what and the chances are very good that we will never know. However, it will be discussed into the ground because all of us are mechanical wizards, know everything there is to know about equipment maintenance and know exactly who to point a finger at. Not every single part is on a maintenance check list. Somethings are highly unlikely to ever be a problem. The part that fell (far from huge by the way) doesn't look like an item that requires a whole lot of regular attention.
 

ninjaprincesst

Well-Known Member
I think if you check the photo it is EPCoT that has that parking and the monorail crosses over the lane. Probably it continued on its way and ended up back at TTC area before it was stopped. One pickup will not cause the train to stop.

I am more interested if he kept the piece? Finder's keeper's right? Imagine what it would go for on fleabay!
If I read the original new story correctly I think he finally got a security cast member to take it, of course that does not mean that person didn't go straight to ebay.
 

s8film40

Well-Known Member
Hear me out, read my full post or don't quote it.

This week in FL we had a ton of huge thunderstorms. So, maybe lightning hit the track and didn't cause any noticeable damage, but did cause some damage. After that Monorail Blue went over it and the friction (a crack or metal jutting out from potential lightning strike) pulled off parts and started an electrical fire. That's my conjecture and I know absolutely nothing other than what has been given as fact. I base this off the fact that monorails are notorious for electrical fires. Over the years thank God there have been few. But when they pioneered the first daily operating monorail in the Western Hemisphere at Disneyland, poor Bob Gurr (an incredible Imagineer who has worked on many Disney and UNI projects) had encountered electrical fire after electrical fire. There is a great documentary on engineering the monorails on YouTube. As for maintenance, on my last trip a month and a half ago (I went to the Asia for a month since then) they said something like 2 monorails were being completely refurbed, one just got a new paint job, and another new bloomers (the bags between the coaches). So I guess they're maintaining them well. If they didn't these things would not have lasted almost 30 years. That is why I think this was caused by damage to the track, sustained from lightning from the many storms lately, that caused friction, igniting an electrical fire and tearing parts off. For those who say, "why didn't another monorail have this problem, they go on the same track?" That is a fair point; however, each monorail is unique and has many idiosyncrasies that make them so. Maybe a certain configuration of a system from the last refurbishment positioned a part in a way that it would trigger this event.
I don't think it was from lighting strike. It could have been any number of things. One of the common issues with these collector shoes is they have carbon pads on them to allow them to glide smoothly over the bus bar. These pads wear down over time and have to be replaced. Any imperfection in the bus bar could have also been an issue. If it were indeed from a lightning strike, that strike would have shut down the whole system. I don't personally know of any lightning strikes recently, but who knows.
 

raven

Well-Known Member
Hear me out, read my full post or don't quote it.

This week in FL we had a ton of huge thunderstorms. So, maybe lightning hit the track and didn't cause any noticeable damage, but did cause some damage. After that Monorail Blue went over it and the friction (a crack or metal jutting out from potential lightning strike) pulled off parts and started an electrical fire. That's my conjecture and I know absolutely nothing other than what has been given as fact. I base this off the fact that monorails are notorious for electrical fires. Over the years thank God there have been few. But when they pioneered the first daily operating monorail in the Western Hemisphere at Disneyland, poor Bob Gurr (an incredible Imagineer who has worked on many Disney and UNI projects) had encountered electrical fire after electrical fire. There is a great documentary on engineering the monorails on YouTube. As for maintenance, on my last trip a month and a half ago (I went to the Asia for a month since then) they said something like 2 monorails were being completely refurbed, one just got a new paint job, and another new bloomers (the bags between the coaches). So I guess they're maintaining them well. If they didn't these things would not have lasted almost 30 years. That is why I think this was caused by damage to the track, sustained from lightning from the many storms lately, that caused friction, igniting an electrical fire and tearing parts off. For those who say, "why didn't another monorail have this problem, they go on the same track?" That is a fair point; however, each monorail is unique and has many idiosyncrasies that make them so. Maybe a certain configuration of a system from the last refurbishment positioned a part in a way that it would trigger this event.
That would make sense but witnesses on the ground and inside the train said the vehicle was making noises (cracks and pops) and it was even smoking. Also the other trains on the same track were uneffected and operated just fine when it reopened later. For this reason I still believe it was a piece of the train. And the piece looks very much like the pick-up bar that drags along the bottom of the train to get electricity. Just my observation.
 

raven

Well-Known Member
If this is the case, WDW has a dramatically flawed maintenance transformation. The monorail system operates maybe 18 hours a day, leaving a net 6 hours per day for maintenance.

I work in an mechanically intricate process that operates 24 hours a day 360 days per year with 80 year old equipment. This facility operates above 93% OEE and is allotted 8-10 hours maintenance downtime per month.
Well the same trains aren't used for the full 18-hour period. They switch them out throughout the day. But Disney has many trains and the ones not in immediate use are being maintained. Or, so we hope.
 

WEDwaydatamover

Well-Known Member
I think everyone gets that the monorails were incredibly well designed and don't owe Disney anything at this point.

They were designed in the 1980s and are unfortunately not going to hold up long enough for every last suit to receive a bonus for passing the buck.

Will Disney break before it bends?
 
Last edited:

raven

Well-Known Member
I don't think it was from lighting strike. It could have been any number of things. One of the common issues with these collector shoes is they have carbon pads on them to allow them to glide smoothly over the bus bar. These pads wear down over time and have to be replaced. Any imperfection in the bus bar could have also been an issue. If it were indeed from a lightning strike, that strike would have shut down the whole system. I don't personally know of any lightning strikes recently, but who knows.
This is what Inwas talking about as well. Didn't use the term "bus bar" but that's the piece I believe it may be from the photo.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom