IAmFloridaBorn
Well-Known Member
If it did that would have helped JP.The Jeep ride should have happened years ago......insane that it didn't.
Not a fan of Safari Jeep Rides though IMO.
If it did that would have helped JP.The Jeep ride should have happened years ago......insane that it didn't.
Would have preferred Helicoptours, but I'm fine with the Kong ride since it's going to be an all-ages E ticket. A safari ride would be too much like JPRA and DINOSAUR. Plus Kong has giant insects, etc. which provides a fresh addition to the JP area. Kong, a family suspended coaster in place of PF (using some of TE plot), a Mr. DNA dark ride and a unique flat essentially transforms the north/northwest portion of IOA into a must-do section year round, rather than just summer.If it did that would have helped JP.
Not a fan of Safari Jeep Rides though IMO.
A Safari ride would not be like JP river adventure. People saying that have no creativity at all geez.Would have preferred Helicoptours, but I'm fine with the Kong ride since it's going to be an all-ages E ticket. A safari ride would be too much like JPRA and DINOSAUR. Plus Kong has giant insects, etc. which provides a fresh addition to the JP area. Kong, a family suspended coaster in place of PF (using some of TE plot), a Mr. DNA dark ride and a unique flat essentially transforms the north/northwest portion of IOA into a must-do section year round, rather than just summer.
Both would start out with meandering through a dino habitat. Then, something goes horribly wrong. Not saying the safari would be a bad addition, but there's other options for JP than something that could potentially draw comparisons to JPRA. More of the same won't help Universal conquer the pixie dustA Safari ride would not be like JP river adventure. People saying that have no creativity at all geez.
Theme parks clone rides or ride stories all the time, and get away with it.
Doesn't mean it was going to happen.
That would olny make sense. Why would they take up JP's expansion room for a ride that SHOULD be for JP. It's the exact same. It will be a dumb move on their part.I have held my ground that this could be for JP but we shall see.
What would it be then? Let's hear your plan for the ride.A Safari ride would not be like JP river adventure. People saying that have no creativity at all geez.
Theme parks clone rides or ride stories all the time, and get away with it.
Doesn't mean it was going to happen.
Great concept but there is just one thing. I know you probably just copied and pasted this but Brontosaurus doesn't exist. It was a mistake when they put the wrong skull on an Apatosaurus skeleton and thought it was a new Dinosaur It's most likely Brachiosaurus. Sorry, just a pet peeve of mine.Here's some old plans for a Jeep ride, scrapped before River Adventure moved forward:
When Islands of Adventure opened twelve years ago some rides envisioned for the Jurassic Park Island were unfortunately cancelled. One of them was the Jeep Safari ride which would have been great as you will see on the renderings below from artist and former WDI Imagineer Scott Scherman.
The first artwork above shows a concept for the jeep vehicle of the ride. The next one below shows the jeeps entering a Jurassic Park camp before they move inside the land where the AA dinosaurs are.
On the next artwork things are becoming serious as the jeeps would have gone right under a giant Brontosaur. These artworks are unfortunately in low-res but if you enlarge them you can see that others animals would have appear like a long Apatosaur neck, from the lagoon. Before moving under the Brontosaur the jeep would have enter the land through the famous Jurassic Park gates and moving under a kind of giant net where probably others effects or animals would have await the guests.
On this last artwork - which was not the last part of the ride - you can see clearly a jeep being attacked by what seems to be Velociraptors. The arrows on the drawing indicate for sure other kind of effects and i wish i could tell which one, if i only knew... What i know is that others renderings exist and that in another scene a T-Rex would have "stepped on" the guests jeep and spun it in a way similar to the scene in the movie!
http://disneyandmore.blogspot.com/2011/10/islands-of-adventure-jurassic-park-jeep.html
Nope still next year until one of the trusted insiders say otherwise. It's amazing though isn't it? Universal in a way can market this ride twice. Once when it opens because it's brand new then another time when the movie comes out basically saying "did you enjoy the movie? Come experience the ride we opened last year if you haven't already"!!! Obviously an ad wouldn't use those exact words but you get my point. Disney could potentially do the same with Pandora if the Avatar sequels are successful by continually advertising it as the movies come out.
Wait, are we actually implying that JPRA isn't a resounding success at Universal?It seems very much like JPRA was an attempt to compete with Splash Mountain. The ride felt fake and lame because there was no river cruise tour in the first JP movie. A jeep ride would have resonated much more with me and I would have to think audiences as well because that is what actually happened in the movie.
Wait, are we actually implying that JPRA isn't a resounding success at Universal?
The river ride is based on a scene in the book. A river ride was also teased in the background of the first movie as an attraction "coming soon" after the Jeep tour that would open with the park.It seems very much like JPRA was an attempt to compete with Splash Mountain. The ride felt fake and lame because there was no river cruise tour in the first JP movie. A jeep ride would have resonated much more with me and I would have to think audiences as well because that is what actually happened in the movie.
The river ride is based on a scene in the book. A river ride was also teased in the background of the first movie as an attraction "coming soon" after the Jeep tour that would open with the park.
I would have liked a Jeep ride too but what are you gonna do.Right, but that's not exactly the same as having the scene where the T-rex attacks the jeeps being one of the most iconic scenes in the history of film.
I would have liked a Jeep ride too but what are you gonna do.
Great concept but there is just one thing. I know you probably just copied and pasted this but Brontosaurs doesn't exist. It was a mistake when they put the wrong skull on an Apatosaurus skeleton and thought it was a new Dinosaur It's most likely Brachiosaurus. Sorry, just a pet peeve of mine.
Both would start out with meandering through a dino habitat. Then, something goes horribly wrong. Not saying the safari would be a bad addition, but there's other options for JP than something that could potentially draw comparisons to JPRA. More of the same won't help Universal conquer the pixie dust
The difference is that the thing that goes horribly wrong in all of those attractions isn't similar to one another. There's also plenty of attractions where nothing goes wrong (D and E tickets) -"Then, something goes horribly wrong." That's the storyline for many, many attractions at UOR, WDW, and theme parks around the world. Just pick a random attraction, and see if it applies.
Everest? Something goes horribly wrong. Tower of Terror? Something goes horribly wrong. Escape from Gringotts? Jaws? Mummy? Stitch? Big Thunder? Forbidden Journey? Mission Space? Spiderman? Dinosaur? Trasnformers? Star Tours?
Something always goes horribly wrong.
Meg? Well, you get the idea.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.