But hasn’t this guy done EXACTLY what DVC’s goals are now?
In all likelihood, yes.
Let’s be serious...they don’t want to increase perks. Wouldn’t it make more sense to push people into paying higher prices/expecting less for the longterm?
I actually think they’ve given a lot more perks than they wanted these last few years...obviously there’s more pressure on DVC than we’re lead to believe.
In most cases...they’ve already got you - no matter what people say in bluster.
Don't underestimate the perks as a sales tool. Dollar-for-dollar, $120 per point resale without perks still makes more sense than $180 with perks. But emotional response to the perks plus 50 year contract (vs. as little as 24 yrs resale), easy financing and other factors...it's easy to talk oneself into the direct buy.
As for funding the perks, a lot of it was accomplished by channeling existing promotions budget to more useful areas. In the last few years they've eliminated things like the weekly meets at Atlantic Dance hall (50 days per year of facility rental, staffing, refreshments) and the 4-5 holiday Member Mixers at Epcot. They used to give away free lithographs just for viewing a promotional webcast, which thousands of members attended just for the free print. DVC's old referral program was horribly mismanaged, yet allowed owners to earn up to $2800 cash per year if their name was mentioned at the time of purchase. Go back a few years further and they shuttered the pricey, ill-advised sales offices in Chicago and Long Island.
Route the funds from those programs to much showier benefits like Moonlight Magic and the Epcot lounge. Throw in an impressive array of restaurant discounts (around 100 locations at WDW currently) and the occasional ticket/AP offer and suddenly the perks are a lot more appealing. Members feel appreciated and prospects are a lot more likely to buy direct rather than risk losing access to the free night at Magic Kingdom with all-you-can-eat Mickey bars.
And it may not even be costing DVC more.