Snow Queen 83
Well-Known Member
Under that pretense, would you also argue that The Seas Pavilion should also be removed?
Nope, it actually has elements of education. Moana's new attraction is just random fountains.
Under that pretense, would you also argue that The Seas Pavilion should also be removed?
Nope, it actually has elements of education. Moana's new attraction is just random fountains.
Is it? I didn't realize you had already experienced it....
IIRC, Disney actually said in the announcement that the attraction will involve exploring the "natural water cycle".
It just doesn't belong in a park called "Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow". It would be like putting Moana in Tomorrowland.
Please, it's a park called Epcot , it was never that acronym. Its evolving past the failed edutainment concept.
What failed was a succession of executives who chased trends and assumed their audience was very, very stupid.Please, it's a park called Epcot , it was never that acronym. Its evolving past the failed edutainment concept.
They are tearing down a building to put it in and completely re-routing how you walk into the park...I think that is pretty invasive!I will give it a chance does not look to invasive.
Don't confuse your hopes and dreams with what was constructed as Epcot... It was nowhere near Progress City in scope or composition.What failed was a succession of executives who chased trends and assumed their audience was very, very stupid.
No, it wasn’t Progress City, but it WAS successful edutainment. And unsuccessful management.Don't confuse your hopes and dreams with what was constructed as Epcot... It was nowhere near Progress City in scope or composition.
It would be quite something if the CEO of Disney was asked when hit films like Lion King, Frozen, or Moana would be featured in the parks and responded that the company had to wait a few hundred years to see if they had staying power.This could feasibly be done nicely, but I really have to comment on the notion that Moana IP is parallel to the types of IP that were used early on in the parks. Most of what was included in the MK and particularly Epcot was based on public domain/classic works. MK included centuries-old fairy tales and classic children's literature, and Epcot included major themes relating to the future, the earth, etc. No matter how good a new movie is, it's not going to have the same timeless resonance as themes based in oral traditions and the public imagination.
This is why it really rankles when Disney (indirectly) calls stuff like Moana timeless. I thought it was a good movie, but call me again in 200 years. That's (at least) how old Snow White is.
Looking at the concept art this does not look like a splash areaI could understand a Pocahontas Meet and Greet being the Nature section, but not a Moana splash area. She belongs in Adventureland with a real attraction (like Fire Mountain).
No, it wasn’t Progress City, but it WAS successful edutainment. And unsuccessful management.
I don't think we know that. I'm envisioning something like The Oasis exhibits with some interactive fountains. If that's the case I'm 100% on board. I'd also argue that the themes of Epcot and Animal Kingdom are getting a bit more blurred.Nope, it actually has elements of education. Moana's new attraction is just random fountains.
Maui is well over 2000 years old. All of his exploits on his skin and in his song are generally drawn from actual ancient myths (no giant crab though). The film's quest is a very loose family friendly adaptation/extension of Maui's failed quest for immortality, with Te Fiti as a stand-in for Hine-nui-te-po, with her Te Ka form even being called Te Po in early script drafts.This could feasibly be done nicely, but I really have to comment on the notion that Moana IP is parallel to the types of IP that were used early on in the parks. Most of what was included in the MK and particularly Epcot was based on public domain/classic works. MK included centuries-old fairy tales and classic children's literature, and Epcot included major themes relating to the future, the earth, etc. No matter how good a new movie is, it's not going to have the same timeless resonance as themes based in oral traditions and the public imagination.
This is why it really rankles when Disney (indirectly) calls stuff like Moana timeless. I thought it was a good movie, but call me again in 200 years. That's (at least) how old Snow White is.
By that measure the Magic Kingdom also failed as it once had more sponsors.Nope, it was unsuccessful in retaining those sponsors that were paying the bills for Future World. Industries change including those who sponsor venues.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.