Goofyernmost
Well-Known Member
Yea, but, how about the part that if you went to Tibet that is what it would look like. You don't get better theming then that. Is it our spoiled ways that upset us that not everything in the world is western culture or affluence? I understand someone not understanding that if they have never been exposed to the rest of the world, but, if after someone bothered to explain that the reason it looked that way is because that is what it would look like in countries that don't have our lifestyle that is just plain denial. It is as close as one can get to the reality of the area that they are trying to simulate without actually going there. They didn't spend $150 million on the string of lights, so how much they spent on the attraction is not even relevant to how it is presented. If we find that to be offensive then we are either unaware that other cultures exist or we just don't believe that anything is different from downtown Miami.I think I get your point.
Every area of DAK has some level of 'Chester&Hester Syndrome', to varying degrees. Just because what you see is intentional and quite intricate design does not mean the final result is pleasing. DAK often loses itself in its own cleverness. Deliberate ugliness, intentional cheap looks, decay, or backstories driven too far or being too specific.
To put it differently, if you spend $150 million to make something look like $2.00 garbage, then it looks like $2 garbage. Just with a great coffee table book devoted to it.