You don't get to be at Disney for that long without being a Yes manHappy that he's a 40 year veteran of WDW! That's amazing.
You don't get to be at Disney for that long without being a Yes manHappy that he's a 40 year veteran of WDW! That's amazing.
Or if you're smart.You don't get to be at Disney for that long without being a Yes man
I really hope.So could this new guy affect REAL change at the parks, in a positive way?
Smart people know when to say “yes” and when (and how) to put up a fight.Or if you're smart.
ExactlySmart people know when to say “yes” and when (and how) to put up a fight.
I wish him the best.And so it begins. The people standing with/behind him in creating one vision are difference makers. Sometimes you need a strong likable front person who can find middle ground, to make the ideas of some very creative people more palatable and likely to come to fruition. Those people will finally have someone who can get their message across to some more "stubborn" members of the top level. Will it stop all the madness? No, but, it certainly will change the dynamic that has been so poor for a long time now. Short answer on is this a good thing. Yes. Yes it is.
He either agrees with Guardians of the Galaxy coming to Epcot or decided it wasn't worth putting up a fight and was a "yes man" in this case. Which do you think is the case?And NO he is not a YES man. He is a very smart man who has the full support of key people. People they wont listen to all the time unless there is a calming voice to settle the disputes. He is the calming voice. Those who have been clamoring for change and one voice/vision, more akin to what Walt built, will finally get their wish. Even mid level management in some parts of the company have been hearing these whispers and were already excited. Based on interaction with him Ive had the opportunity to have, he is gracious, smart, a die hard Walt guy, and understands that the major players in creativity just needed someone to bring them all together. I, for one, am very happy and excited to see this finally happen. I assumed it would be later this year, but, when they started moving the pieces around in December, I should have realized thee timeline was much sooner.
One page of "at least he's not the worst"You don't get to be at Disney for that long without being a Yes man
This sounds great! Thank you for sharing this.Its a bit more than that. While there may be more "qualified" people, the bigger issue has been the inability of people to get along and have a single vision when it comes to fixing/improving the parks at WDW. He is not a yes man, but, he is someone who can enable people to work in one direction. And yes that direction is a Nostalgic type Disney feel, but, dont let that kid you into thinking he is not for change and improving things. Even if it includes IPs in parks, new ideas, new ride systems, etc. There are still a LOT of creative genius minds in imagineering. We see ther results and praise their work a lot. The issue has been the inability of people to get along and merge those minds with the people who control the $$$ or make other decisions. He brings the two together. Good business sense and great people person. Just because he is nice doesnt mean he cant sit people down and say, enough. Here is where we are. Here is where we need to get to. Lets find a way. His voice will resonate. And there will be a huge benefit to certain people in imagineering and upper levels of creative because of it.
Could it be that the bean counters see some sort of writing on the wall in over investing in short-term-IP-ification, perhaps wanting to diversify the future of the parks with more ever-green and classic Disney (substance/imagination)? Bean counters love them some portfolio diversification. This could be the best move for them financially regardless of an Iger agenda.Ask yourself this- Why would executive leadership promote someone to greater positions of power if they showed ANY sign of being at odds with their plans? Regardless of whether he had any say in the matter, I don't think Jim would have been promoted at all if he wasn't willing to at least put on the facade of agreeing with the GOTG project.
It's similar to Joe Rohde publicly promoting Mission Breakout in DCA. I absolutely do not him being actually happy (behind whatever facade he put up) with having to help create and promote the attraction. I think he did so to maintain a position in the company for longer. So he held his breath and swallowed the bitter medicine.
Unless you have substantial political leverage, Disney bean counters aren't going to promote someone who isn't enthusiastic about their wishes. Even WITH political sway, Tony Baxter was pushed out for speaking his mind and standing up to Iger (his influence was probably why he wasn't fired outright for insubordination, instead given a Legends award and a lucrative "consulting position").
Considering what we've been told from insiders, it sounds like the IP push is going to continue. They may pare down or cancel projects (business as usual), but IP will persist. Hence the recently announced plans for "Pixar Pier" in DCA.Could it be that the bean counters see some sort of writing on the wall in over investing in short-term-IP-ification, perhaps wanting to diversify the future of the parks with more ever-green and classic Disney (substance/imagination)? Bean counters love them some portfolio diversification. This could be the best move for them financially regardless of an Iger agenda.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.