RandySavage
Well-Known Member
Understanding this is a subjective discussion, I'm curious as to what specific & overall features of a Busch Gardens or Efteling would make one feel they are more beautiful than places like all the Disney Castle Parks, DisneySea, EPCOT and Animal Kingdom. Because to me they're not even in the same league (I'd group Busch Gardens, Knotts, Phantasialand, Efteling, etc. as "Tier II": the type of regional parks that feature mostly naked or lightly-themed amusement rides & coasters and some decently-themed areas as well). I've never heard BGW mentioned as a contender for the 'Most Beautiful Theme Park in the World' before this thread... That title has always been contested among DL, DLP, MK, AK, TDS, EPCOT, etc... the usual suspects of Tier I parks.
IMO, if you're talking themed architecture, then the rendering of places like Busch Gardens and Efteling aren't near the level of Disney's or Universal's best efforts. If it's grand vistas or beautiful landmarks, Disney wins. If you're talking a cohesiveness or coherence of vision, where the parks' thematic realms harmonize internally and externally to give purpose or to transport visitors to another time & place, even being diluted, Disney's parks still generally crush the Tier II parks. And what the Tier II parks do well to immerse visitors is generally undone by the naked coasters or other rides above and around the good stuff.
Efteling's Arabian Area:
Disney equivalent:
or to be really unfair and bring TDS into the contest:
BGW Old Half-timber Europe
Disney equivalent
***
The only unique advantage that a BG might have had, from what I can recall, over a DL or EPCOT is the more extreme topography and large mature tree canopy (no one is more irked than me that MK has cut so many of their tall, fat shade trees down) which can make you feel like your in an old growth forest valley. And, yes, that is a very good thing. Big old trees give a sense of age and authenticity to a theme park (which is much needed since so much is artificial). The most impactful thing about first visiting Disneyland for me was how the big old trees made the park feel like a magnificent arboretum as well as a theme park. I haven't been to BGW in a long while, so maybe I'm missing something, but as far aesthetic beauty as a theme park, I would never have considered it to be the equal to most of Disney's portfolio. Colonial Williamsburg - if a Living History Park can be compared to a theme park - is a reconstruction executed at a more authentic level (though less theatrical, obviously) than even what Disney has done.
As far as most beautiful park, right now I'm tempted to give my vote to Animal Kingdom... This is an amazing photo, but the subject is a work of art:
IMO, if you're talking themed architecture, then the rendering of places like Busch Gardens and Efteling aren't near the level of Disney's or Universal's best efforts. If it's grand vistas or beautiful landmarks, Disney wins. If you're talking a cohesiveness or coherence of vision, where the parks' thematic realms harmonize internally and externally to give purpose or to transport visitors to another time & place, even being diluted, Disney's parks still generally crush the Tier II parks. And what the Tier II parks do well to immerse visitors is generally undone by the naked coasters or other rides above and around the good stuff.
Efteling's Arabian Area:
Disney equivalent:
or to be really unfair and bring TDS into the contest:
BGW Old Half-timber Europe
Disney equivalent
***
The only unique advantage that a BG might have had, from what I can recall, over a DL or EPCOT is the more extreme topography and large mature tree canopy (no one is more irked than me that MK has cut so many of their tall, fat shade trees down) which can make you feel like your in an old growth forest valley. And, yes, that is a very good thing. Big old trees give a sense of age and authenticity to a theme park (which is much needed since so much is artificial). The most impactful thing about first visiting Disneyland for me was how the big old trees made the park feel like a magnificent arboretum as well as a theme park. I haven't been to BGW in a long while, so maybe I'm missing something, but as far aesthetic beauty as a theme park, I would never have considered it to be the equal to most of Disney's portfolio. Colonial Williamsburg - if a Living History Park can be compared to a theme park - is a reconstruction executed at a more authentic level (though less theatrical, obviously) than even what Disney has done.
As far as most beautiful park, right now I'm tempted to give my vote to Animal Kingdom... This is an amazing photo, but the subject is a work of art:
Last edited: