GladToBeHear
Well-Known Member
Still my favorite park. But I've been advocating on this board for years that they put it out of its misery and rename it. Just let it be its own thing at this point.
This.The original mission has been dead for years the new mission maximize profits like the other 3 parks.
The Simpsons Episode 7 Season 14 2003.Most of that 'original Epcot' has been gone since the early 90s. I get that it's cool to rant about the current leadership team but the transformation of Epcot began under Eisner. And the reason it is gone is that guests told Disney they were not interested in that version of Epcot by not visiting and responding to guest surveys that it was 'boring' and there was nothing for their kids to do. Guests expected rides, not 'edutainment', and Epcot did not deliver that. In fact from 1987 to 1994, annual attendance at Epcot dropped by over 30%- the guests were telling Disney they didn't like what they were selling.
I get that there are a small number of die-hard fans (a far smaller number than those fans are willing to admit) of the original themes of Epcot but the mass public didn't care at all and as a result, didn't spin the turnstiles. So Disney had to make some changes to things which brought us things like Test Track followed by the closure of Horizons to be replaced with Mission:Space. And continuing forward it brought us Soarin' and Frozen in Norway. Disney listened to their guests and adapted the park to changing demographics and demands.
I get that some like it to be a museum but that museum would not fund itself and would have otherwise closed.
You know..I'd be up for these attractions any day..The Simpsons Episode 7 Season 14 2003.
Guess we can put park reservations on the list of things The Simpsons predicted.The Simpsons Episode 7 Season 14 2003.
Guess we can put park reservations on the list of things The Simpsons predicted.
But scary on how much they predicted..............................The Simpsons have always been about as funny as a gutful of pinworms.
It really did.And it did an amazing job of that. It was awe inspiring.. you left the park feeling inspired.. it was odd.
The fact that World's Fairs no longer capture the public's attention (and discretionary vacation money) at least partially explains why Epcot's original intent could never survive today. Until I looked them up on Wikipedia, I didn't even realize these events were still held (or were, pre-COVID, at least), but now they're called Expos and act as little more than glorifed trade shows.It goes without saying that EPCOT Center has always been a completely different (and better, IMO) entity than Walt Disney's EPCOT, the planned city. The defense that "it doesn't matter what happens to EPCOT Center because it was never Walt's EPCOT" irks me. I'm very glad we got EPCOT Center (by John Hench, Randy Bright, Card Walker, etc.) rather than a Walt's planned 'city', which was mildly interesting as modernist city-planning, but not something I'd go on a vacation to see.
And I'm reading some fiction that EPCOT (the theme park) was a financial albatross for Disney. It was quite the opposite. Expensive, but lifting WDW's attendance and profits througout the 1980s and 90s (MGM created some attendance poaching), a pillar of the expansive Vacation Kingdom, must-see destination that WDW became. The tonal changes that began to infect EPCOT Center in the 90s were more top down (sponsers, Eisner's vision (or lack thereof), a new gen of WDI coming up, etc.) rather than a groundswell of "we don't like this park, change it" from the audience, as someone proposed above.
It's been interesting for me to discover how much the great World Expositions going back to the 1800s have had in common with EPCOT Center. A typical template since the later 1800s has been to build an Expo in a park with half devoted to Technology & Innovation (industry, it was called), and half devoted to a collection of cultural pavilions from around the world. So describing it as a "permanent world's fair" has been accurate though probably little understood by the public who aren't familiar the history of the pre-war World's Fairs. The Dedication Plaque supports this.
The fact that World's Fairs no longer capture the public's attention (and discretionary vacation money) at least partially explains why Epcot's original intent could never survive today. Until I looked them up on Wikipedia, I didn't even realize these events were still held (or were, pre-COVID, at least), but now they're called Expos and act as little more than glorifed trade shows.
Expos still look interesting. They just don't capture the public's attention like they used to.Countries still build pavilions for them, though. There's one happening in Dubai right now which looks pretty cool -- there a ton of national pavilions with unique architecture. I think they're basically an architectural showcase at this point, although they do have exhibits inside.
View attachment 611596
View attachment 611599
View attachment 611600
Expos still look interesting. They just don't capture the public's attention like they used to.
These days, I wonder if even Disney fans would notice if the company built attractions for an Expo, like Walt did for the 64-65 World's Fair in Queens (as if Chapek would ever do such a thing...).
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.