You're joking, right? So adding skewed angles to the edge of one otherwise flat side of a cube removes its soundstage look? Have you ever been to the park in-person? :shrug:
![]()
![5678171058_53475bbf7f.jpg](http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5222/5678171058_53475bbf7f.jpg)
I'm not seeing the resemblance. At all. Anyone else?
And I'm not sure what Everest has to do with USF's appearance, but since you brought it up, no, I don't think it has a soundstage look. But hey, if you think that MIB is on par with Everest with respect to not looking like a soundstage, so be it.
They don't have to be "on par." That wasn't my point. But since you've made the comparison, they're both themed and their show buildings can't be seen from the park, so yeah, they're "on par" in that sense.
MIB's facade isn't a soundstage or a plain box, regardless of your personal opinion of its aesthetics. Those are the objective facts. And quite frankly the rest of your comparisons are too disingenuous to even get into. We could spend all day pulling up pointless comparison photos, but anyone who's ever been to both parks in-person, and seen everything they have to offer, knows you're being disingenuous. Yes, that includes myself, since you asked. :hammer:
I never suggested that Disney's soundstages and show buildings were "invisible." They are simply better hidden, and/or accompanied by a greater degree of exterior theming elements.
In contrast, at USF, you don't have to "know where to look," you just have to "look."
You stated that attractions such as Haunted Mansion were, and I quote, "very well hidden." Seeing as how Haunted Mansion's show building is perfectly visible, I guess you hold Universal to higher standards than Disney. :lookaroun