Increased foot traffic at Epcot's International Gate...

eliza61nyc

Well-Known Member
When the Skyliner becomes the primary mode of transport to Epcot from those 3 resorts, the IG will become the primary entrance for those three resorts. I don't see panic -- I see concern about the lack of transparency on modifying the IG to accommodate the increased traffic at park open.
It's 19 months away. Is Disney obligated to be transparent to the public every step of the way?
 
Last edited:

Dutch Inn '76

Well-Known Member
-- I see concern about the lack of transparency on modifying the IG to accommodate the increased traffic at park open.

"Transparency." Y'all act like The Mouse owes you information or something. :facepalm:

I've always been amazed at the UNDERUTILIZATION of the IG and Crescent Lake area. I'm thinking that the suits agree with me, and that the location of this stop is not a coincidence. They are trying to bring more people in the IG; to spread the masses out more evenly. I'm certain they will increase the number of turnstiles here. Of course, they are also adding value to these three resorts - and you know what comes with added value...
 

Dutch Inn '76

Well-Known Member
Of the consumer, or producer sort? If you're suggesting it falls on the consumer side, please explain because I don't follow here.

Consumer (then producer). AoA, Carib Beach & Pop Century all have cool new transportation directly to the front gate of two parks - not even the original monorail loop offer$ that.
 

OneofThree

Well-Known Member
Consumer (then producer). AoA, Carib Beach & Pop Century all have cool new transportation directly to the front gate of two parks - not even the original monorail loop offer$ that.

That's great. But what the OP's thread brings into question is the effect upon YC, BC, and BWI -three resorts for which the deluxe price Disney charges should continue to afford equally deluxe amenities.
 

Dutch Inn '76

Well-Known Member
That's great. But what the OP's thread brings into question is the effect upon YC, BC, and BWI -three resorts for which the deluxe price Disney charges should continue to afford equally deluxe amenities.

How will the increase of folks though the IG or strolling the Boardwalk negatively impact their "Deluxe" experience? When I stayed at the Boardwalk, there wasn't enough foot traffic to keep the shops and sidewalk performers/vendors busy - so they would shut down if it wasn't "prime time." Perhaps this will bring in more customers to keep it busy more often.

I was merely stating that the increase of guests to the IG area is not a byproduct of something else, but probably part of the plan all along. It will relieve the congestion at the front gate, and it will provide more paying customers to the Boardwalk.
 

PeakSeason

Well-Known Member
How will the increase of folks though the IG or strolling the Boardwalk negatively impact their "Deluxe" experience? When I stayed at the Boardwalk, there wasn't enough foot traffic to keep the shops and sidewalk performers/vendors busy - so they would shut down if it wasn't "prime time." Perhaps this will bring in more customers to keep it busy more often.

How long has it been since you've stayed there? This is completely different from the experiences I've had on ten, ten day trips over the past three years.
 

rreading

Well-Known Member
Personally, I would like to see the gondolas continue on after the IG stop to have a further drop at the main entrance to Epcot. As nice as it is to show up at World Showcase, I miss entering the park under Spaceship Earth. Plus, on a night I’m staying on the monorail, I’d like to take the gondola express to the monorail rather than the 1/2 mike walk to the front of the park.

I suppose that it could make the IG problem worse though for all those going to Epcot from the monorail for dinner reservations.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
It's never going to be the same. The boardwalk area and International gateway is like this big secret that alot of park goers don't know about.

BoardWalk is regularly advertised by WDW to all guests to get them to go there.


I think it's going to be a nightmare. The IG entrance is by far the best entrance because it puts you virtually between the countries and the rides.

No, it doesn't. All the current rides are the same distance from both gates or decidedly much closer to the main gate.


Because it is OUR personal entrance!

No, it's not.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Unfortunately, this will become an attraction. So yes, people will go out of their way to ride on it. And it will impact foot traffic
It's not simply the IG entrance that some of us are concerned about, it's the increase in foot traffic and day guests that will potentially be wandering about the resorts (Beach Club, Yacht Club, and Boardwalk). For those of us who regularly vacation there, an increase in crowds isn't a positive thing. More people taking a side diversion to wander around the resort grounds will also mean more people in line at the eateries and hanging in the lobbies.

They do the same with the monorail and that has existed fine for quite a while. The restaurants on the monorail loop *want* foot traffic. This forum and the internet can't say enough about going to the restaurants on the monorail loop. You may want a hotel devoid of guests, the hotel doesn't. Besides the Crescent Lake resorts are full of crowds worse than mere vacationers... they're overrun by conventioneers!


Think about it, when completed Disney’s Art of Animation, Pop Century and Caribbean Beach resorts , Disney’s Hollywood Studios, Beach and Yacht Club resorts, Boardwalk, Swan and Dolphin resorts, Friendship boats plus Gondola joy riders and main gate folks trying to enter quicker will all converge at that tiny two or three point entry gate. I'm one of those that rationalized the large expense of staying at the beach club because of the proximity to the international gateway. I suspect the beach club lobby will also become a pass thru for guests busing over to access the IG also. I guess it may all work put after the initial curiosity settles down. If not I may rethink my resort preferences . Imagining the first food & wine after gondola opening...yikes !

Naming the resorts that are already on Crescent Lake and then adding in the new resorts that will have Gondola access to the IG overstates the case of extra traffic. The IG already handles the traffic from the Crescent Lake resorts. It will add on CBR, Pop, and AoA... at least just those people who would have bussed to the front gate of Epcot. That's not really a significant extra number, especially considering that when the Gondola opens, the people choosing those resorts will have their eyes on DHS and SWL.


Bronson, you are spot on. We have always stayed at Y&BC for easy and unpressured access to Epcot, a quiet night on the Boardwalk, short lines at Ample Hills, and just the relaxing feeling the whole area seemed to provide. No reason to pay the premium price anymore IMHO. I still remember when we would just walk in and get a table at Beaches and Cream.

Monorail resorts have paid premium prices with folks using the monorail to go to their restaurants. You're not paying extra for reduced crowds. You're paying extra for being walking distance to two gates.


Couldn't Disney just make the gondola for those staying at the resorts? Magic band would say if your a hotel guest. If you had a dining reservation couldn't the band have that info too?
They could, but WDW has no reason to. They want people to go to the BoardWalk and the other Crescent Lake restaurants. They regularly advertise BoardWalk to all guests.


This. And in the morning, it will be spread out a bit as people show up over the course of a couple or a few hours. At night though after Illuminations...imagine all those people trying to get through there and waiting for the Sky Liner. It will be a nightmare. Disney Dish podcast was just talking about this on yesterday's episode. Apparently Disney forgot to think about it too and is now freaking out.

1. The gondolas can dispatch 200 people every six minutes... so, don't worry about crowds. Besides, the line-up will be for the people at the far-away resorts. The Crescent Lake people would just walk past them.

2. Jim Hill on Disney Dish is just wrong about WDW having no plans for the IG crowds. He's been wrong about a lot of things.


While I wish it was my personal entrance, it's not and never felt it was. My concern is the extremely narrow area it is right now with little to no room to actually expand it. While on our recent trip the line was backed up to where the gondola construction actually is by the boat dock so add in the extra traffic when the gondolas actually have people on them then where is everyone going to go? Up the hill toward Beach Club? Maybe Disney has a construction plan set to expand that entrance for the added visitors but I haven't seen/heard of that being out there.

There is deceptively plenty of space. Big swath between the tapstiles and canal. A lot of area leading to the bridge. A lot of area left over around the station. And a lot of area on the walk way on the opposite side of the ferries.


I do not think your comment is fair or realistic at all. We are talking a massive increase of people coming into the parks at that entrance and only two tap styles. If you don't see that as an issue I I don't know what to say honestly. It's not like we're trying to keep people away from an entrance, we're just trying to make it not insane to get into which is truthfully what I fear. I do not own at Beach Club or Boardwalk because of this and really it could be that I won't stay there again if it turns out to be bad. And same with the other resorts on the Gondola line
Maybe there is a plan for additional tap-styles?

There will be more capacity added for tapstiles. (Note the spelling of 'tapstile' as a variant of 'tunrstile' :) )
 

correcaminos

Well-Known Member
They do the same with the monorail and that has existed fine for quite a while. The restaurants on the monorail loop *want* foot traffic. This forum and the internet can't say enough about going to the restaurants on the monorail loop. You may want a hotel devoid of guests, the hotel doesn't. Besides the Crescent Lake resorts are full of crowds worse than mere vacationers... they're overrun by conventioneers!




Naming the resorts that are already on Crescent Lake and then adding in the new resorts that will have Gondola access to the IG overstates the case of extra traffic. The IG already handles the traffic from the Crescent Lake resorts. It will add on CBR, Pop, and AoA... at least just those people who would have bussed to the front gate of Epcot. That's not really a significant extra number, especially considering that when the Gondola opens, the people choosing those resorts will have their eyes on DHS and SWL.




Monorail resorts have paid premium prices with folks using the monorail to go to their restaurants. You're not paying extra for reduced crowds. You're paying extra for being walking distance to two gates.



They could, but WDW has no reason to. They want people to go to the BoardWalk and the other Crescent Lake restaurants. They regularly advertise BoardWalk to all guests.




1. The gondolas can dispatch 200 people every six minutes... so, don't worry about crowds. Besides, the line-up will be for the people at the far-away resorts. The Crescent Lake people would just walk past them.

2. Jim Hill on Disney Dish is just wrong about WDW having no plans for the IG crowds. He's been wrong about a lot of things.




There is deceptively plenty of space. Big swath between the tapstiles and canal. A lot of area leading to the bridge. A lot of area left over around the station. And a lot of area on the walk way on the opposite side of the ferries.




There will be more capacity added for tapstiles. (Note the spelling of 'tapstile' as a variant of 'tunrstile' :) )
I haven't seen the confirmation of such yet.. And note auto correct can make mistakes for me. I forgot to go back and change it. I already knew but tablets make for interesting spelling at times
 

eliza61nyc

Well-Known Member
If they want me to book a vacation a year or more out, yes.


LOL,
while that is a nice thought @larryz, it's probably not very realistic. I find most major construction projects to be the opposite. The problem with being totally "transparent" this far ahead is exactly what you see here. If things do not go EXACTLY has once advertised or announce, the public has a freaky deaky meltdown. Look at this site. how many "original plans" of rides have been published, scrutinized and critized?? every complaint thread includes one with the tag line "it was originally supposed to be done this way".

In that type of atmosphere why would a company let you know what it was planning on doing? especially at the stage where there is a good chance changes and delays will occur.

But your sentence does it the proverbial nail on the head. Folks here take Disney "personally", as if plans and offerings should be made to make "individuals" happy. which leads to bitter disappointment.

Sure IG was a great "secret" but guess what, secrets get out. they are not doing it to make people here upset. Like great little known restuarants, eventually the word gets out and everyone wants to get a table.
 

eliza61nyc

Well-Known Member
That's great. But what the OP's thread brings into question is the effect upon YC, BC, and BWI -three resorts for which the deluxe price Disney charges should continue to afford equally deluxe amenities.

Why would it effect any of these hotels? Yes one of the reason you pay is for the location but the location of these hotels isn't changing. You will still be able to walk to 2 parks. Not one amenity will change due to the Gondolas
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom