I've recently been doing research on Europa Park in Germany and I was interested to see that much of it is largely inspired by Disney. They have a sphere similar to Spaceship Earth that contains a Space Mountain-esque rollercoaster inside. There's a lengthy Ghost Castle dark ride that has a stretching room like the Haunted Mansion and there was even a previous attraction known as the Universe of Energy, taking riders back in time to encounter dinosaurs. Following this trend, the park had a boat-based dark ride known as Pirates in Batavia, located in the Netherlands area of the park and depicting a pirate raid on the Indonesian trade city of Batavia during the Dutch colonial era. It's clearly inspired by Disney's Pirates and even has an indoor restaurant that allows you to look at riders going by. Still, this attraction which was built in 1987 eventually burned down in an accident in 2018. Quickly, the park rebuilt it and the attraction reopened with significant updates in 2020. Europa Park from what I could see, clearly prioritizes guest experience and is full of ridiculous, intimate detail and has far more attractions than you could possibly even do over a few days.
It makes me wonder if Pirates of the Caribbean burned down tomorrow, whether at Disneyland or Magic Kingdom, if current Disney leadership could even be bothered to rebuild it. Does the legacy and culture of the Disney parks matter to a CEO and board that only care about immediate return on investment? I'm inclined to think that no, they wouldn't. The space would either sit vacant for decades, or at the very least be replaced with the Shanghai version of the attraction. It's concerning to me that a park smaller than Disney is willing to quickly rebuild an expensive legacy attraction of theirs, but I doubt that Disney would do so the same if they found themselves in that situation.
Here's a video of the ride for reference:
It makes me wonder if Pirates of the Caribbean burned down tomorrow, whether at Disneyland or Magic Kingdom, if current Disney leadership could even be bothered to rebuild it. Does the legacy and culture of the Disney parks matter to a CEO and board that only care about immediate return on investment? I'm inclined to think that no, they wouldn't. The space would either sit vacant for decades, or at the very least be replaced with the Shanghai version of the attraction. It's concerning to me that a park smaller than Disney is willing to quickly rebuild an expensive legacy attraction of theirs, but I doubt that Disney would do so the same if they found themselves in that situation.
Here's a video of the ride for reference: