I think, in the end, Epcot would have ended up looking like Celebration. Now that I think about it, Epcot was already planned as 2 different areas. The land where people would live (The green belt on the outside), and the town "center". I guess that is pretty much what they are doing today (contrary to what I said before. Yes, I changed my mind
) They have the seperate place for visitors to learn about the new ideas and technologies (Epcot), and the place for people to live (Celebration). Really, looking into the info I have on Epcot, the green belt was going to look pretty much like Celebration, contrary to the "Jetsons" type look that everyone seems to believe. I am sure the original designers were just as concerned about "neighborliness" as the designers of Celebration are today. I am sure they wouldnt have tried to accomplis this with "technology", but by encouraging different programs around the neighborhoods to bring the people together and to keep everyone out of trouble. And the design I am sure would forbid places like "dark alleys" and "Ghettos" to develope, which could have also helped. I was never quite certain how close they were going to allow visitors to get to the towns. I wouldn't have liked to live in a place where everyday tourists drive by my home, riding in the same peoplemovers I do, etc. That would have been going too far. On the other hand, they might have closed off places to the general public, but for the homeowners in the area who would have wanted to leave Epcot often, it might have gotten a bit tedious to have to have identification everywhere you go. Of course, mabey it wouldn't have, if all you needed was, say, a special card to get to the peoplemovers, or a simple sticker for you car when you drive out of town. Still, with all of the things included in the town, they may have rarely ever left (except for vacations and going to work).
I dont know. Mabey its just the original design of Epcot that made my eyelids go up. It is designed so simple, in the "wheel and spkes" type fasion, that in my opinion might work for some cities, making travel easier and such. Walt probably saw it this way, too, but of course, at the time, no one was doing anything like it, and Isuppose he figured if no one else was going to do it, then I will. He had a very big interest in the future of cities, and just like me and the things I like, wouldn't want to see those things go down the drain. Not saying they did, many cities have developed tremendously over the past decades, and because of how they were built, they may never be able to change the design of the cities. This has always been a problem. Roads built centuries ago still exist today, and cause problems such as traffic, hard to follow roads (making it hard to get around, easy to get lost), and such. And because of how long we have done nothing to change the designs of cities, it will now almost be impossible to change anything, because of all the buildings, towns, houses, etc that have been built around them. As implied by Epcot, the solution may be not to try to get around these problems, but to start from scratch, designing towns not just for present day needs, but also for future needs. I guess I am going off the subject here by saying that I hope
someone will try to do this.
I am happy with today's Epcot, but I hope the original idea never goes away.