How Would You SWOT WDW?

Cosmic Commando

Well-Known Member
Yikes! All of the hate for a little 2x2 chart! Well, I have never done a SWOT at work in my life, so I don't harbor any ill will. I wasn't going to do one, but after reading all of the "hate mail", I guess I have to.

STRENGTHS
-Customer service exceeds expectations: Even if you think it's not what it was, the service in the rest of the world has gone downhill faster.
-Diverse and plentiful array of offerings: watersports, golf, horseback riding, running, team sports facilities, shopping, (some)nightlife, water parks, theme parks, and more. You could definitely spend a week or two there.
-The ability to leverage the love for the parks into different revenue streams that require minimal investment: namely, I'm thinking of DVC, backstage tours, and to some extent merchandise (especially the high end collectibles).
-Wonderful stable of characters represented at the parks that have rides, do meets and move merch.
-Elements of the parks that are ingrained in popular culture: Pirates, Mansion, Small World, Epcot, Dumbo, Castle fireworks, probably more. It's like free advertising whenever these are mentioned somewhere and they are stuck in people's minds.
-WDW dining has come miles from where it was years ago. I think people view it as a dining destination, so they come with pocketbooks open for food.

WEAKNESSES
-The size of the property makes it hard to maintain and hard to keep an eye on everything.
-The development of the property, many would say, was not very well planned out. There should be more areas like the Epcot, Boardwalk, Y&B, S&D, DHS corridor and less like the DAK, AKL, VAKL, Coronado, All-Stars section of property.
-Downtown Disney is a chore to get to. Especially on Disney transportation. And this is even more true for people in your most expensive rooms at the monorail resorts.
-There are several cases where there was more to do in the past or the offerings were substantially better. There are fewer attractions in Animal Kingdom than there were five years ago. Pleasure Island is still empty. If things opened like that it would be different, but having something there and then having it taken away creates a sour taste.
-The marketing seems very family-focused, almost to the point of excluding people without kids.
-The Disney "image" makes them susceptible to scammers and bad news affects them more. See the GAC abuse (and I'm ONLY talking about for the people who don't need it). There have been stories of tour guides using it as their "secret" to get their groups around faster. Since Disney moreso than other companies rules with a velvet fist, they haven't taken any action yet. When it looks like Tigger punches someone or someone dies on Mission: Space, it's national news. Even though Disney really did nothing wrong in these cases that I'm aware of, it makes national news.
-Homogenization of merchandise. It seems like it's easier to throw the same stuff in every store, but WWoHP and Carsland/Buena Vista Street have reawakened the idea that merch matched to a well-themed location will move in a big way.
-A very large portion of DHS was originally the Backlot Tour and, thus, was never designed for guest flow or navigation. A large part of the park is being used in a substantially different way than originally envisioned, and it hurts. Even in DCA, they replaced a bad entrance area with a good entrance area, they replaced facades and finishings. They replaced stores with better-looking stores. They replaced attractions with other attractions. The whole back half of DHS was designed for the needs of the trams and a working production facility.

OPPORTUNITIES
-In addition to the many characters substantially represented, there are many Disney characters (no licensing needed) that are either unrepresented or underrepresented. Wall-E, Incredibles, Nightmare Before Christmas, Princess & the Frog, Tangled, Aladdin, and even Lion King I would say are underrepresented and would make good rides of varying types that would draw people to the parks and move more merch than they're moving now.
-Even now, a majority of guests stay off-site. That suggests that there is still room for more hotel rooms.
-Every park has areas where expansion could occur or where you could knock something down with minimal effect on park operations.

THREATS
-Fuel instability. The average WDW guest comes from far away. That makes it more expensive to travel. If fuel prices go up, some may not go at all and some may drive instead of fly. If you're already driving, you're more likely to go off-property to eat and visit non-Disney attractions.
-Increased investment from nearby parks. WWoHP has shown that even off of Disney property, people will still make their way to see quality attractions. It has given confidence to Uni's new deep-pocketed owners. Yikes. Even Sea World is stepping up its game, and Legoland seems to be doing OK.

Insert IMOs where appropriate.
 

sgtmgd

Well-Known Member
Do I get any points for quickest thread to totally derail in the history of the forums? One point? A t-shirt at least?

I found it interesting more so as I am looking hard at Disney as a potential place Id like to work in 3-4 years. I do IT work and currently am working to implement ITIL into the Army, Disney has been using the ITIL model for sometime.
 

ParentsOf4

Well-Known Member
I agree about this forum being for open discussion, but before doing any type of SWOT analysis, like I do for my own company, I would have more facts and figures at my disposal, instead of just conjecture. In other words, without info that Disney has gathered from attendance, surveys and many other internal and external sources, any type of SWOT analysis on our part is irrelevant.
Sadly, Bob Iger is too much of a numbers man. It's a large part of the reason why so little positive has happened at WDW over the last 7 years. Trying to justify a new attraction/land using a cost-benefit analysis is extremely difficult. It's one of the reasons why Universal has WWOHP and WDW does not. Besides, you know perfectly well that "facts and figures" can be cooked to justify almost any decision. During the Eisner era, all sorts of numbers were inflated to justify financially bad decisions, from EuroDisney to the purchase of the Family Channel.

Sometimes a SWOT analysis has to be more about instinct. The kind of instinct Walt Disney exercised when he created the first animated feature film (Snow White) or opened the first fully realized theme park (Disneyland). Sometimes, the best leadership is about being a visionary, not about reading a spreadsheet.

So, thank you Bob Saget for giving this a go!
 

Bob Saget

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
As an example - last weekend, I was at DHS, and (as seems to be happening often now) RnR broke down. A cast member got on the intercom and asked everyone to exit the line and building. I have never heard a crowd 'boo' so loud at a Disney park ever. And the overheard comments were overwhelmingly "THIS is what we paid all this money for?" or "For all the money they are charging, you would think they could keep their rides working..." When you pay a premium price - expectations rise. And Disney is almost charging BEYOND just a premium price at this point...
Totally agree with this ^

We were in line for HM once. There was a (very kind) gentleman in line behind us whom we were talking to. Just before entering the holding room he mentioned something about "ticket prices inching closer & closer to $100 for a day.." People are well aware. The question is, how much can they tolerate?
 

Bob Saget

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Yikes! All of the hate for a little 2x2 chart! Well, I have never done a SWOT at work in my life, so I don't harbor any ill will. I wasn't going to do one, but after reading all of the "hate mail", I guess I have to.

STRENGTHS
-Customer service exceeds expectations: Even if you think it's not what it was, the service in the rest of the world has gone downhill faster.
-Diverse and plentiful array of offerings: watersports, golf, horseback riding, running, team sports facilities, shopping, (some)nightlife, water parks, theme parks, and more. You could definitely spend a week or two there.
-The ability to leverage the love for the parks into different revenue streams that require minimal investment: namely, I'm thinking of DVC, backstage tours, and to some extent merchandise (especially the high end collectibles).
-Wonderful stable of characters represented at the parks that have rides, do meets and move merch.
-Elements of the parks that are ingrained in popular culture: Pirates, Mansion, Small World, Epcot, Dumbo, Castle fireworks, probably more. It's like free advertising whenever these are mentioned somewhere and they are stuck in people's minds.
-WDW dining has come miles from where it was years ago. I think people view it as a dining destination, so they come with pocketbooks open for food.

WEAKNESSES
-The size of the property makes it hard to maintain and hard to keep an eye on everything.
-The development of the property, many would say, was not very well planned out. There should be more areas like the Epcot, Boardwalk, Y&B, S&D, DHS corridor and less like the DAK, AKL, VAKL, Coronado, All-Stars section of property.
-Downtown Disney is a chore to get to. Especially on Disney transportation. And this is even more true for people in your most expensive rooms at the monorail resorts.
-There are several cases where there was more to do in the past or the offerings were substantially better. There are fewer attractions in Animal Kingdom than there were five years ago. Pleasure Island is still empty. If things opened like that it would be different, but having something there and then having it taken away creates a sour taste.
-The marketing seems very family-focused, almost to the point of excluding people without kids.
-The Disney "image" makes them susceptible to scammers and bad news affects them more. See the GAC abuse (and I'm ONLY talking about for the people who don't need it). There have been stories of tour guides using it as their "secret" to get their groups around faster. Since Disney moreso than other companies rules with a velvet fist, they haven't taken any action yet. When it looks like Tigger punches someone or someone dies on Mission: Space, it's national news. Even though Disney really did nothing wrong in these cases that I'm aware of, it makes national news.
-Homogenization of merchandise. It seems like it's easier to throw the same stuff in every store, but WWoHP and Carsland/Buena Vista Street have reawakened the idea that merch matched to a well-themed location will move in a big way.
-A very large portion of DHS was originally the Backlot Tour and, thus, was never designed for guest flow or navigation. A large part of the park is being used in a substantially different way than originally envisioned, and it hurts. Even in DCA, they replaced a bad entrance area with a good entrance area, they replaced facades and finishings. They replaced stores with better-looking stores. They replaced attractions with other attractions. The whole back half of DHS was designed for the needs of the trams and a working production facility.

OPPORTUNITIES
-In addition to the many characters substantially represented, there are many Disney characters (no licensing needed) that are either unrepresented or underrepresented. Wall-E, Incredibles, Nightmare Before Christmas, Princess & the Frog, Tangled, Aladdin, and even Lion King I would say are underrepresented and would make good rides of varying types that would draw people to the parks and move more merch than they're moving now.
-Even now, a majority of guests stay off-site. That suggests that there is still room for more hotel rooms.
-Every park has areas where expansion could occur or where you could knock something down with minimal effect on park operations.

THREATS
-Fuel instability. The average WDW guest comes from far away. That makes it more expensive to travel. If fuel prices go up, some may not go at all and some may drive instead of fly. If you're already driving, you're more likely to go off-property to eat and visit non-Disney attractions.
-Increased investment from nearby parks. WWoHP has shown that even off of Disney property, people will still make their way to see quality attractions. It has given confidence to Uni's new deep-pocketed owners. Yikes. Even Sea World is stepping up its game, and Legoland seems to be doing OK.

Insert IMOs where appropriate.
Great stuff! Under strengths, I didn't even think to put the vast variety of other entertainment/leisure options outside of the park gates. Possibly one of the biggest strengths (imo).
 

luv

Well-Known Member
WDW is exactly the kind of thing that will keep bringing customers until the customers just cant take it anymore and give up. Once those customers are gone, it will be very difficult to get them to come back.

I don't know why they work so hard to see how little they can offer before the people just stop coming and the parks go belly up. Once they find out, it is over for them. Bouncing back from that will be nearly impossible.

I think Disney's biggest problem is thinking that the public...and their most loyal customers, especially...are suckers that can be taken for granted and will keep handing over money no matter what. Their arrogance will be their downfall. IMO.

And down the street, Uni keeps getting better and better...

Hey, hare, check out that tortoise!
 

Bob Saget

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
WDW is exactly the kind of thing that will keep bringing customers until the customers just cant take it anymore and give up.
Talk about appropriate timing for this...but did anyone watch Jay Leno last night (Fri, 10/12)? I don't know if this was a re-run or a new show, but during Jay's monologue, he mentioned how Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt are planning to build their very own theme park with their own $$$. The punchline? At least building you own theme park is cheaper than taking the family to Disneyland. Lol

Had to share this.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom