From descriptions i've read of Tiger River, only the ending would have included rapids and gone fast, likely no animal exhibits in those parts. Most of the ride sounds like it was going to be very slow and calm, probably much slower than Kilimanjaro Safari's jeeps and providing plenty of opportunities to view the animals. The concept art also backs this up as well, showing the boats travelling through very calm waters past one off the exhibits-
![]()
Hidden barriers are used in a lot of areas at Animal Kingdom already, including on Kilimanjaro Safari to keep the more dangerous animals in check. Not an issue.
From descriptions i've read of Tiger River, only the ending would have included rapids and gone fast, likely no animal exhibits in those parts. Most of the ride sounds like it was going to be very slow and calm, probably much slower than Kilimanjaro Safari's jeeps and providing plenty of opportunities to view the animals. The concept art also backs this up as well, showing the boats travelling through very calm waters past one off the exhibits-
![]()
Hidden barriers are used in a lot of areas at Animal Kingdom already, including on Kilimanjaro Safari to keep the more dangerous animals in check. Not an issue.
I hope they take their time. Well let the riders take their time. I love lengthy rides through actual build environments!Perhaps the Boat ride in Pandora is taking what Tiger River was to be....Granted it's probably even smaller depending on how long the boat ride is...
![]()
Remember, the definition of an E-Ticket has changed. Ticket level doesn't have to do with length and quality, but popularity. Nowadays, Pirates and HM would probably be C-D Tickets, and 7DMT would be an E-Ticket, even though we might see that differently. Even if NRJ is on par or better than DLRs Pirates, FoP will still be the main draw/"E-Ticket" of the land.Yes!
I'm really hoping Na'vi River Journey will be at a minimum 10 minutes actual ride time (hopefully closer to 15). That allows for the development of, you know, an immersive experience. It would be especially important because MK's version of PoTC is so inferior mainly because of how it's truncated, so WDW still lacks a lengthy boat ride through detailed scenery.
Unfortunately, long ride times seem to be truly a thing of the past. Plus, if Disney told that LA Times reporter it would be a D-ticket, how long could it be? The concept art looks like it contains fairly expansive scenery (though of course we all know how reliable concept art is), so the only way I can imagine it being a D-ticket is if there are only let's say 2-3 of those scenes, and no buildup scenes like at DL's PoTC, making the ride time very short.
I had always thought it was about popularity. More people want to ride them, so they don't give as many tickets for them. That way everything balances out. Back when there were tickets, was Dumbo as popular? I don't have a clue. I'm sure it could have had to do with budget, but not solely. Like I said, nowadays theres no way some of the old E-Tickets would still be. Country Bear Jamboree? No way I would use my E-Ticket on that. It was groundbreaking and popular at the time, but now the theater is always empty. I don't hate it, but I would take Splash Mountain over it any day.That's interesting. I was viewing D-ticket vs E-ticket as really being about scale/budget. (Although I'd think it can't be just about popularity, or else Dumbo and Teacups would be E-tickets.) If by referring to it as a D-ticket, that article really just meant "secondary to Flight of Passage," that would be great news. I really hope they've given Na'vi River Journey at least $100-150 million out of the total Pandora budget. I've been concerned that it has been relegated to "something for people who can't ride FoP," rather than being given a budget to be worthy in its own right (and this view seems bolstered by the fact that they don't seem to focus on it very much when discussing Pandora).
In Disney's perspective, it sounds like they have two modern definitions for the E ticket, neither of which seem to have anything to do with quality or ambition (i doubt imagineers have much of a say in the matter of ranking rides in terms of quality anymore). Internally, it seems like executives use it as a means to predict how popular a ride will be among guests. But publicly, the E ticket is now used (and abused) simply as a marketing buzzword.Remember, the definition of an E-Ticket has changed. Ticket level doesn't have to do with length and quality, but popularity. Nowadays, Pirates and HM would probably be C-D Tickets, and 7DMT would be an E-Ticket, even though we might see that differently. Even if NRJ is on par or better than DLRs Pirates, FoP will still be the main draw/"E-Ticket" of the land.
Should put some real crocodiles in the water. Not only does this keep to the theming of the AK but would probably stop folk complaining how short the ride was![]()
I was referring to any park at WDW.I'd say the latest amazing attractions in any park are Radiator Speings Racers, Mystic Manor, and perhaps Ratatouille. The problem is the Iger administration had to fix DCA, HKDL, and WDSP first because those parks were in desperate need. Fantasyland areas have never been focused on major e-tickets, so two Fantasyland-dark-ride-level attractions made sense for that expansion, and lifted the average Fantasyland attraction quality (though I would've preferred one e-ticket, but again that wasn't the purpose of that expansion). Now they're finally turning their attention to WDW in terms of major attractions with Avatar and Star Wars, so I think those will be the real test...
It's going to be VERY disappointing and lame if it's not at least a reasonable 8-10 minutes or more most other Disney boat rides are, amazing animatronics or not (which are great and all, but the park needs more lengthy calm rides). That 3-5 minute estimate (which I hope is just your opinion) about matches Maelstrom, which was about 4-5 minutes long and was previously the shortest boat ride in WDW. Maelstrom's brevity was a serious flaw that was constantly griped about even among its fans.I hate to say it, but expectations should be at about 3-5 minutes for the Na'vi boat ride. Expect some amazing animatronics, though.
I meant the animated "The Jungle Book", not the new live/CGI movie coming out next year.
Another idea is if it's raining people would still be able to ride the "Jungle Book" portion of the ride. Inside of the show building there would be a switch track just before exiting the building that would keep you inside of the show building.
The ride would look like this:
Good weather - load inside of the building; "The Jungle Book" (part 1); outside cruise; "The Jungle Book" (part 2); unload
Bad weather - load inside of the building; "The Jungle Book (part 1); "The Jungle Book" (part 2); unload
This "bad weather" version of the attraction would also be used in the evening when it's dark outside.
I just watched this movie again this weekend, and the first thing I thought when it ended was Kali would be a good place for a 'Bear Necessities' overlay.
I do enjoy the ride as it is, but I think Jungle book is under represented in the parks.. I understand that it isn't new (released in 67), and most of the voice talent are gone, but Peter Pan was released in 53, Dumbo was in 41.
I may be in the vast minority, but I would like "The Jungle Cruise" to be re-themed to "The Jungle Book" (animated version). Those songs are timeless and that is a great movie
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.