I think she means where it is located in the pavillion.Soarin over land..how is that odd? Mountains, Oceans, Deserts, Cities, Agricultural Sites, Golf Courses...seems like a fit to me.![]()
I think she means where it is located in the pavillion.Soarin over land..how is that odd? Mountains, Oceans, Deserts, Cities, Agricultural Sites, Golf Courses...seems like a fit to me.![]()
You could be right...I hope I didn't come across nasty as I didn't intend to, just kind of thinking out loud about how I connect it to the land and think it is a good fit or at least as good as any they might have come up with. As for the physical location. Really the only part of it with a physical location in the Land Pavilion is the entrance. When you think about it how it is physically connected to the land as well as philosophically connected is some kind of happy accident.I think she means where it is located in the pavillion.
Everest around $100m in 2006, ToT around $85m in 1994 - which was about $111m when Everest opened.
Question is which was better value?
Yeah. I guess so, but it's just so "shoved" back there! It should be featured more IMHO.Soarin over land..how is that odd? Mountains, Oceans, Deserts, Cities, Agricultural Sites, Golf Courses...seems like a fit to me.![]()
If the yeti worked, I'd say they were both amazing value. Unfortunately...Everest around $100m in 2006, ToT around $85m in 1994 - which was about $111m when Everest opened.
Question is which was better value?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.