Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't really trust the Disney of 2020 to deliver a great second park experience.
I'd prefer they add on to the existing park.
I'd prefer they add on to the existing park.
Once this expansion is over, HKDL will have 20 rides
You have a great point here. Better to keep investing in the 1 park and making it the best it can be.I wouldn't really trust the Disney of 2020 to deliver a great second park experience.
I'd prefer they add on to the existing park.
I’d rather they stop messing with the existing park. It’s bad enough it’s now got a weird tower of towers with some sort of rose windowed torture chamber.I wouldn't really trust the Disney of 2020 to deliver a great second park experience.
I'd prefer they add on to the existing park.
some sort of rose windowed torture chamber.
The loss of the second gate plot is a huge loss for Disney. Admittedly, I know that its likelihood of getting developed soon was unfortunately low, especially with Shanghai, but that is the plot of land I was most looking forward to seeing a Disney Park on. The way it sat against the water would have allowed for similar sight lines to the likes of Tokyo Disney Se that would have been amazing.
I just hope that Disney is still able to hold onto enough land by the main concourse to make a shopping+dining district.
Correct, however I personally doubt that we’ll see Disney jump at the opportunity to buy it. I do, however, expect to see other land developers jump at the opportunity.Losing the first right to buy doesn't mean they still can't buy it.
here is an interesting article which deails the restrictions on the second park site:
‘The deed of restrictive covenant ensures the fairytale world remains visually distinct from its surroundings and that the landscape is aesthetically compatible with the attraction.
The unused plot cannot be used for residential purposes, commercial facilities, hotels, other entertainment venues or theme parks. Any buildings erected must be less than 20 metres (66 feet) tall and only low-intensity use is permitted.
Despite the limitations, a range of facilities could still be constructed, including a park, an indoor aquarium, an arena, live theatres, government offices, restaurants or an exhibition centre, to name a few.’
What now for empty Disney plot? Government ‘must work with theme park’
The theme park lost its rights to develop the 60-hectare site, but under a deal Disney struck with the government, the use of the plot is hampered by numerous restrictions.www.scmp.com
with the Hong Kong government owning the majority of Hong Kong International theme parks it will be interesting to see if Disney can enforce the restrictions or if the government will alter them to get more out of a valuable site
Still more of a full day park than Hollywood Studios, or Animal Kingdom, or Walt Disney Studios Paris....and maybe even Epcot...For comparison, DLP has 21 rides and TDL has 25 (like your example, not including walk-throughs, shows, parades etc).
But HKDL does rely more on flat rides than the others thanks to Toy Story.
The park already reserve area for Downtown Disney (since 2005).buy the land and build a Downtown Disney
I think the purpose is to prevent competitors (like universal) build theme parks next to HKDL.The unused plot cannot be used for residential purposes, commercial facilities, hotels, other entertainment venues or theme parks
I expect the most likely use will be a shopping centre a poor use for such a great site.
Disney should have built a downtown with the park as they did in Paris and Shanghai
I think the plan was to build a Downtown Disney along the Park Promenade (which idk why they didn't make it)This is VERY blue sky and really not possible, but I wonder if Disney could build a mall on that site, and leave a lot of empty room for rides. Then in 10 or 15 years when they're ready to build a new park they could just build the rides and leave the restaurants & shops.
Certainly is. This also paves the way for the controversial East Lantau Metropolis project as they are puttingI wonder if this is tactics to get Disney to pay more for the land
You have a similar road like this where I live in London, UK. The M11 motorway was planned to be extended into the city but ends on the outskirts the road separated and ends at what were planned to be sliproads to a never built motorway to a never built airport. Future planning at its finestThis is one of the best example of the great masterplaning of the Hong Kong Disneyland Resort and the expectations of growth of the resort they had in mind during construction :
View attachment 501560View attachment 501575
At first glance, one might wonder why the end of Penny's bay Highway, when arriving at the first Disney roundabout, gets its two sides separated by consequent gap and not immediately next to each other like every other roads.
The explanation is simple and lies in the planned growth of the resort at the time of of its construction : as we can see on HKDLer's post and the following plan, Penny's Bay highway was planned to be extended into to mountains at the east of the roundabout to join a planned highway at the far east of Lantau Island. Therefore these two lanes would have ended up being slip roads to access the resort from the extended Highway, and have to be separated by a gap in order to fit the continuing Highway in between them !
View attachment 501562
Today, more than 15 years later, this unusually big roundabout still sits very lonely without any projects in view...
I hope that, at least, if East Lantau Metropolis gets greenlight, they could use and extend the existing transport infrastructures (Penny's Bay Highway and MTR Disneyland Resort Line) in order to get more local traffic passing by the resort !
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.