Thank goodness I'm not the only one that noticed that.Just watched a ridethru and yeah...amazing it's nearly a 100% copy/paste job from a super limited ride experience that was originally due to lack of space back when it was Maelstrom.
To be honest, my local friends were extremely impressed with frozen ever after, so although it still is an admittedly lazily copied ride, I think it would fare well with the local audience and people who don’t know that it is a cloned rideThank goodness I'm not the only one that noticed that.
I kept stopping the video to make sure I was watching the right one, LOL.
It kind of boggles my mind, actually - I'd think it would be more of a pain to recreate it than to create something new.
I actually was decently impressed over here with what they were able to do with Malestrom to make it that much of a Frozen ride, but much less impressed when they started from scratch over there and built a whole land around it for what appears to be the nearly the same exact experience.
Oh well, at least for us in the stateside parks, we don't have to say "wow, the one in X-foreign park is so much better..." for this one.
Isn’t that also going to be a clone? Although they sort of get more of a pass since it’s coming along side the new Tangled and Peter Pan rides.Only have to wait til June to see what Tokyo does with theirs
The showbuilding is quite a lot bigger than HKDL's and it is expected to be a different, bigger & better rideIsn’t that also going to be a clone? Although they sort of get more of a pass since it’s coming along side the new Tangled and Peter Pan rides.
That's good. And I am not one to actually hate on clones, generally - they make sense, the majority of people out there are never going to experience more than one Disney resort. While I value uniqueness as a fan, I also understand that people basically expect Disney to have the same rides everywhere, especially at Castle parks.To be honest, my local friends were extremely impressed with frozen ever after, so although it still is an admittedly lazily copied ride, I think it would fare well with the local audience and people who don’t know that it is a cloned ride
I think this also added to my confusion - I thought this was the big impressive one, I confused it with the one coming from Tokyo.The showbuilding is quite a lot bigger than HKDL's and it is expected to be a different, bigger & better ride
I think that there are multiple slight differences. (Eg. the drop is on the left in the HK version while in EPCOT it's on the right) you also get an extra 2 minutes of track to space out the scenes better.That's good. And I am not one to actually hate on clones, generally - they make sense, the majority of people out there are never going to experience more than one Disney resort. While I value uniqueness as a fan, I also understand that people basically expect Disney to have the same rides everywhere, especially at Castle parks.
But this one just surprised me - because logistically, if the building itself was brand new, it would seem to me to be more difficult and limiting than just arranging the same sets in a new way.
I'm actually curious to see what the ride path looks like, if it really is pretty much the same, or if it just feels/looks that way.
It’s not really mind boggling to me cause they kinda did the same exact thing a decade ago when they copied our little mermaid ride 100% exactly (which itself was a repurposed building), dressed the outside up differently and plopped it into new fantasyland as the only other ride in the new land. At least this time around they actually improved the animatronicsThank goodness I'm not the only one that noticed that.
I kept stopping the video to make sure I was watching the right one, LOL.
It kind of boggles my mind, actually - I'd think it would be more of a pain to recreate it than to create something new.
I actually was decently impressed over here with what they were able to do with Malestrom to make it that much of a Frozen ride, but much less impressed when they started from scratch over there and built a whole land around it for what appears to be the nearly the same exact experience.
Oh well, at least for us in the stateside parks, we don't have to say "wow, the one in X-foreign park is so much better..." for this one.
The Little Mermaid ride was developed for both parks simultaneously. At Disney’s California Adventure, the Palace of Fine Arts Rotunda, which was a detached structure, is the only part that remained from Golden Dreams. The theater itself was demolished and replaced by a new, custom show building specifically designed for The Little Mermaid. The Magic Kingdom version opened with the updated animatronics (and show lighting) that replaced the original ones in California.It’s not really mind boggling to me cause they kinda did the same exact thing a decade ago when they copied our little mermaid ride 100% exactly (which itself was a repurposed building), dressed the outside up differently and plopped it into new fantasyland as the only other ride in the new land. At least this time around they actually improved the animatronics
Ah ok, didn’t know all that. But other than the weird hair animatronic, were any of the other ones actually updated?The Little Mermaid ride was developed for both parks simultaneously. At Disney’s California Adventure, the Palace of Fine Arts Rotunda, which was a detached structure, is the only part that remained from Golden Dreams. The theater itself was demolished and replaced by a new, custom show building specifically designed for The Little Mermaid. The Magic Kingdom version opened with the updated animatronics (and show lighting) that replaced the original ones in California.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.