SpectroMan93
Well-Known Member
I mean I think Brightline is better suited to deciding whether this line is commercially viable or not. And they're going through with it so clearly there are numbers and projections that show it is? I'm sure all of the questions and skepticism you've posed here has also been discussed by the people involved. I trust they know what they're doing. Also did you just compare people who choose to commute by rail to flat earthers? Lol what?Are there "some" people who would rather take a longer trip than drive? I am sure there are, there are some people that like almost any kind of niche thing. There are some people who think the world is still flat. The question is are there enough people who would rather take the trip such that it makes sense to invest the money in the project. Your talking about hundreds of millions of dollars, if not more, in investment and hoping to recoup that on the number of people who don't care about timing/cost, and just don't want to make the drive themselves. AND hoping there are enough people who think that way, and need the service on a regular basis enough such that its profitable. The length of the drive/projected train route from SoFL to Tamps is such that your not getting daily commuters.
I agree its always nice to have a second option. And more then one option for a service usually creates competition , and better services overall. But while its nice for the general public to have a 2nd option, that doesn't mean it's commercially viable for a private company to undertake the costs to create the second option.