Hercules Live-Action Movie

NateD1226

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
TheDisInsider put out a RUMOR that Disney has Michael B. Jordan and Ariana Grande high on the list for the roles of Hercules and Megara.

Being produced by Marvel alums Joe and Anthony Russo. This is Disney’s attempt at a live-action Hercules. The script is complete and a director search is underway. Dave Callaham (Wonder Woman 1984), who is also involved with Marvel’s Shang-Chi, penned the script, Which is said to involve some musical sequences. Another thing I have heard but is not confirmed by any means is that superstar Ariana Grande is being considered for the Meg role, while Disney seems high on Michael B. Jordan for Hercules, again nothing is confirmed at this time.

 

EagleScout610

What a wisecracker
Premium Member
FB_IMG_1621822678498.jpg
 

DCBaker

Premium Member
"After watching his live-action transfer of Disney’s animated Aladdin become his first film to crack the billion-dollar gross mark, Guy Ritchie is back in business with the studio. This time, he’s overseeing a live-action film based on the Disney animated film Hercules.

The film will be produced by AGBO, the production company run by Avengers: Endgame directors Joe & Anthony Russo. The studio is in the process of hiring writers after Dave Callaham wrote a first draft."

 

Screamface

Well-Known Member
As long as Guy Ritchie can actually direct the film with his own style. As opposed to just being the man on set to realiszing the pre-vis department's vision.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
As long as Guy Ritchie can actually direct the film with his own style. As opposed to just being the man on set to realiszing the pre-vis department's vision.

So many of the recent Disney 'genre' films have had directors speaking out about how much there was no control issues with Disney. We saw that especially with The Eternals. But Taika also said the same thing. And the directors of No Way Home and Moon Knight mentioned the free hand they were given.

The stories of directors parting company from Disney because of Disney being too controlling are from long ago (e.g., the first Ant-Man). And who really knows who's the 'bad guy' there -- Disney for being too controlling or the director on the road to a disaster?

This is also separate from those directing some of the D+ shows that already had a writer write the story arc. The directors in some of these episodes were brought in to bring a script into reality, not to write their own story. So, yes, in those cases, the pre-vis was fully choreographed according to the vision of a creator, namely, the writer. The round robin directors of The Mandalorian who didn't have experience with action scenes indicated they were very glad to have those pre-vis's done.
 

Screamface

Well-Known Member
So many of the recent Disney 'genre' films have had directors speaking out about how much there was no control issues with Disney. We saw that especially with The Eternals. But Taika also said the same thing. And the directors of No Way Home and Moon Knight mentioned the free hand they were given.

The stories of directors parting company from Disney because of Disney being too controlling are from long ago (e.g., the first Ant-Man). And who really knows who's the 'bad guy' there -- Disney for being too controlling or the director on the road to a disaster?

This is also separate from those directing some of the D+ shows that already had a writer write the story arc. The directors in some of these episodes were brought in to bring a script into reality, not to write their own story. So, yes, in those cases, the pre-vis was fully choreographed according to the vision of a creator, namely, the writer. The round robin directors of The Mandalorian who didn't have experience with action scenes indicated they were very glad to have those pre-vis's done.

Taika is a special case because he is writing as well as directing. So he's there the whole way.

I thought The Eternals was held out as an example where the filmmaker had little control. They get hired, the film is already directed by The Third Floor. That's how someone goes from making an award-winning low-budget film following someone on a road trip to that giant boring, soulless film.

Where Disney pitches directors' films, already with an animatic of the film complete.

I don't know about Aladdin, but I have seen almost all Guy Ritchie films and in no way did that seem like he directed the film. His directing flourishes were not there. It was so boringly directed and shot. Lots of simply crane moves. So I assume it was just a pay cheque or done so they'd finance one of his films.

As to Disney+ shows. Marvel shows are all fine. The Star Wars ones are interesting. Clearly, the pre-vis on The Mandolorian overseen by Jon and Dave is not done for Boba Fett or Obi-Wan. Or not done with the same care. The direction on Boba Fett, even by an experienced director was poor. Obi-Wan is even worse. It seems like no planning was done at all.

So it is a mixed bag of when this is used well or not.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I thought The Eternals was held out as an example where the filmmaker had little control.
She herself said it was her story (she pitched the idea to Feige) with only a little feedback from Feige and company about the world-building. It was, at first, lauded for having such a different tone that comes from the unique perspective of the (academy award winning) director.
 

Screamface

Well-Known Member
She herself said it was her story (she pitched the idea to Feige) with only a little feedback from Feige and company about the world-building. It was, at first, lauded for having such a different tone that comes from the unique perspective of the (academy award winning) director.

That's interesting. Maybe they should have then? As The Eternals was boring AF.
 

DCBaker

Premium Member
"Whereas many of Disney’s recent live-action remakes have been faulted for sticking too closely to the source material, Russo says “Hercules” will be “a little bit more experimental in tone, a little bit more experimental in execution.”

“I think they’re excited to see what we can all bring to it in a way that isn’t just a reinterpretation of the animated film,” Russo adds.

Ritchie is currently working on his own pass of the screenplay from David Callaham (“Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings”).

“Guy is perfect for it because he has penchant for experimentation,” Russo says.

The original “Hercules,” directed by “The Little Mermaid” filmmakers John Musker and Ron Clements, reimagines the legend of the Greek demigod as a story of a rising celebrity who becomes famous due to his acts of heroism. As was the case for all of Disney’s animated films in the 1990s, it’s also a musical, largely sung by a quintet of Black women serving as a Greek chorus.

Russo says the live-action “Hercules” will also be a musical — and share the original’s unconventional approach."

“There are questions about how you translate it as a musical,” Russo says. “Audiences today have been trained by TikTok, right? What is their expectation of what that musical looks like and feels like? That can be a lot of fun and help us push the boundaries a little bit on how you execute a modern musical.”

 

MarvelCharacterNerd

Well-Known Member
Frank Oz's* "Little Shop of Horrors" should be the template for how a fun and campy live action Herc could be done - complete with narrative chorus.

But since none of the live-action remakes have gotten close to the magic of the originals... not holding much hope out for this one either.


* talking from a directorial perspective, not a creative one - that of course belongs to the brilliant Howard Ashman and Alan Menken.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
You joke, but it was under development at one point in 2020:


Don't know if it still is or not, but they were at least considering it.
Have you ever read any of the The Chronicles of Prydain books? Disney does have the film rights for it since 2016. It could be Disney's version of Game of Thrones without the sex and violence. A live action or Disney+ series could be amazing. It would be much better then the awful Amazon's Rings of Power or Wheel of Time adaptations.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
You joke, but it was under development at one point in 2020:


Don't know if it still is or not, but they were at least considering it.
I can't find anything about it's development since 2016. That article you quote gets its 2020 info from a Tweet, but I can't find that Tweet. That person might have just reaffirmed the news that "Disney is working on it" and it got repeated in the internet echo chamber.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I can't find anything about it's development since 2016. That article you quote gets its 2020 info from a Tweet, but I can't find that Tweet. That person might have just reaffirmed the news that "Disney is working on it" and it got repeated in the internet echo chamber.
It was a scoop by Daniel Richtman back in 2020, so of course take it with a grain of salt. But you're talking about a time when Disney was/is talking about live action remakes of almost every animated movie they ever produced. So its not hard to believe this was at least under early development at one point. Whether it went anywhere or not, that remains to be seen.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom