I'm not arguing about those things. I'm pointing out that those things are utterly irrelevant. Each resort is doing well for its parent company and the comparison between the two is nothing more than a distraction for bored fanboiis.
This argument reminds me of DC fanboiis who cheer for Marvel movies to fail just so they can feel superior. Who cares? If DC makes a movie you like, go see it. Marvel's box office has nothing to do with you.
I have never heard of DC fans cheering for Marvel movies to fail, that's so silly. I happen to like both Marvel and DC -- I like Marvel better than DC. But, Marvel's female characters are not the best, imo. I really like Black Widow but she really doesn't do anything all that spectacular.
I just wish Disney could buy DC -- Batman is way too dark. And, I
*despise* the new Wonder Woman costume with a passion!
Ugh.... I just cannot bear to look at this ugly brown costume. Everything is freaking brown -- her hair, her eyes, her boots, even the sword looks brown. Oh, and that brown head piece that looks like a belt stuck to her forehead!
Wonder Woman wears red, white and blue with gold embellishment and stars that sparkle -- and a glistening crown/tiara and 'Bracelets of Submission' that shimmer & shine -- not dull brushed metal. And, last but not least that iconic golden lasso. The upcoming Wonder Woman movie scares me. With that said, I really like the skirt concept. /rant
This entire line of thinking is backwards. Disney CAN build quickly but they don't have to, so they don't. Universal isn't building quickly because they can, they're building quickly because they have to. People forget that Universal was in dangerous shape from a business perspective before Potter. The fire under their *** is from desparation (not so much any more, but when expansion started 5-10 years ago).
Put simply, crowds are going to Universal to experience the latest and greatest attraction. Crowds are going to Disney to experience classic attractions regardless of what year the last E-ticket was built. We can debate the implications of those facts, but facts they are.
Yes, Universal is moving faster than Disney but they're still miles behind in the metrics that matter: room nights and clicks. And they always will be just in the nature of the two properties.
ETA: Most importantly, neither business runs itself to be in competition with the other. Disney doesn't care how long it takes for Universal to build a new ride if Disney's pace works for Disney. Nobody is racing, so it's pretty stupid to make claims about somebody being faster than somebody else. Whoever said New Fantasyland was a response to Potter is completely ignorant of the facts on the subject.
I tend to agree with most of your post except the end part. I'll be the first to admit that I don't have the 'facts', as I wasn't part of the planning process, like you were.
All I know is there were plans announced for a Pixie Hollow meet and greet, then *after* Harry Potter opened -- Disney announced 7DMT, The Little Mermaid Ride, The Beauty and the Beast ride, Dumbo & Story Book Circus, etc. I believe that all of this was in *response* to Harry Potter!