This is just another iteration in a different media environment for Yellow Journalism ...William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, journalism of the 1890s used melodrama, romance, and hyperbole to sell millions of newspapers.
I don’t know if it’s all yellow journalism, but it’s certainly a gray area between reporting facts and endlessly pontificating on “how bad could this get” and “death rates double” when they go from 4 to 8 and you read 6 of those were over 80 years old and 2 had underlying medical conditions.
My point has always been, let’s stick to the facts, minimize the projecting, and report the good news too.
We've literally had people calling for every American becoming infected and 4% of those dying. People threw out this would kill more Americans than all wars combined.
That actually may all turn out true, but:
1) Is it necessary to say it at this point, before it has any basis in reality?
2) Is that really based on any facts or just a worst case chicken little scenario?
It’s basically like me saying x, y, z could happen. If I keep throwing enough things out there, one might stick. But people would call me crazy and stop listening pretty quickly.
We have people that predict things like market crashes, every single year. When the market finally corrects, that person is saying, “SEE, I TOLD YOU!!” Meanwhile, they predicted it 36 times and lost money 35 out of 36 years because they were always too scared to invest.