dave2822 said:Sorry but as unfair as that may sound to you, no one who has read one Harry Potter thread ever wants to read another. They are dozens of pages long, filled with ridiculous ideas, and never ever die (as witnessed by the currently two HP threads floating around). Not to mention this isn't news or rumors. Even a rumor has to have some credit/merit, and HP is never coming. Discuss it in chit chat, or even in WDW General Discussion, but everytime people post in this section it is giving the casual fan who just glances by wdwmagic.com the wrong idea.
Be happy to answer. Firstly, and most importantly, makes no sense to the bottom line, and that is what means the most to shareholders. Airing rights have nothing to do with what we are talking about. Disney Channel has shown Back to the Future 2 on occasion, this argument isn't relevant. You need the rights to build the attraction, the money to build it, and the merchandising rights, which J.K. will never give up, or will ask for way too much of a cut for it to be worth it for TWDC.
And, to those who think it belongs somewhere, where?
Magic Kingdom: Never, Harry Potter doesn't belong anywhere near Mickey Mouse. Fantasyland is filled with Disney classics, not attractions they simply own the right to and has no other affiliations with them. Winnie the Pooh, Peter Pan, IASW, Dumbo, Harry Potter? please.
EPCOT: This one is the funniest. World Showcase is about attention to detail and realism. Harry Potter is fantasy, and set in fantasy. Just because the author is British does not make it o.k. to stick it in that pavilion. And if you honestly believe that attraction would fit in with the rest of World Showcase .....
So this brings us to Disney Studios, where non-Disney affiliations live. Star Tours, Indiana Jones, all of these attractions Disney is affiliated with have stood the test of time, and proven to be enjoyed by all audiences. Harry Potter certainly can't say that, and who knows if this is a generation fad and will look horrible in a decade. Think in the future guys.
dave2822 said:Be happy to answer. Firstly, and most importantly, makes no sense to the bottom line, and that is what means the most to shareholders. Airing rights have nothing to do with what we are talking about. Disney Channel has shown Back to the Future 2 on occasion, this argument isn't relevant. You need the rights to build the attraction, the money to build it, and the merchandising rights, which J.K. will never give up, or will ask for way too much of a cut for it to be worth it for TWDC.
.
artdude323 said:You know, it's very simple - if you are so tired of reading threads that have the name HARRY POTTER in the titles, IGNORE THEM and move on. It's really not your place to tell people what to write, it's your place to tell yourself to NOT read the threads if you aren't interested in the topic. Seems pretty simple, no? Maybe only to those who can be responsible for themselves first and don't expect much accomodation from everyone else.
artdude323 said:I guess someone lied to me all these years - I had NO idea that Winnie the Pooh or Peter Pan were original Disney characters, I thought they were characters that Disney bought the rights to use and developed past their original state. Just like they could do with Harry Potter, if they wanted to put him in Fantasyland, where all these other non-Disney affiliates live as well as at MGM.
artdude323 said:As for Epcot being the funniest because it's so realistic, I'll believe that when you show me a real, live troll like those in Maelstrom at Norway, or children like those in El Rio. Or when the Chinese movie shows the poverty and conditions of most of the people who live there. There's nothing "realistic" about any of those and they're no more or less fantasy that HP is, and even if you go to Future World, when was the last time you saw a shrinking audience? Or time travel to Dinosaurs? Or for that matter, Ellen Degeneres on Jeopardy? So much for your hard core reality. Give the hardcore statements a rest and think a little before you post such "absolute" statements.
artdude323 said:I don't say I think Harry Potter belomgs at Disney or he doesn't, I just say that the board nazis who declare topics off limit for more posts really need to see that they aren't the last word, and there's a staff to keep that control. You aren't needed for it.
Disneydreaming said:Yes, well I am a stockholder, with a pretty good chuck invested. I think that adding a Harry Potter ride will boost interest and attendance in the parks. It would increase bookings from around the world, since Harry Potter is such a worldwide phenomenom. People that come from all over the world stay longer, not a 3 or 4 night stay. They will dump more money into the parks. Also JKR and merchandising rights....I think she might be willing to give them to Disney, because after her 7th book is published, interest and sales will have hit their peaks, and she would be wise to have a theme park such as Disney to continue to push sales in merchandising, videos, cd's and books. I think it is a win-win situation for everyone except everyone on these boards who hate Harry Potter.
dave2822 said:The threads about HP, monorail, 5th gate, IJA, all have been discussed to death, and yet everytime another thread comes up it is discussed for 12 pages more. It's not my place to tell people what to write, but this is Disney World News and Rumors, and by your theory I can go and start a thread about how I wonder if Disney will ever buy Six Flags and it's ok. This topic has no spot in this section, and every time people post about it, others will think it's a credited rumor ready to be greenlighted. Even General Discussion, or better yet, Chit Chat, is it's rightful space. These threads last for months and take away from other good discussion that could take place, and they always turn ugly, by evidenced from your attack on me here.
They didn't put either attraction in their parks until they were recognizable Disney icons. So, Disney will need to buy Harry Potter from J.K., and completely develop it on their own for it to be in the Magic Kingdom, or they will still have to buy the rights for it to be in MGM, and they would never get merchandising rights from her right now. Either way, it would take a long time for anything to developed, including a lot of money, on something that could most certainly still be a fad. And I don't think HP is an American icon like Pooh or Peter Pan is either.
- those are Norway legends and myths, truly a part of their past and their culture. Harry Potter isn't that way to England.
- poverty in China isn't a relevant argument, World Showcase is about glorifying countries.
- Harry Potter obviously won't be in Future World, so non of those arguments are relevant either.
So then why did you just go nuts? If this was just an attack on me, then go ahead and PM me. We can work it out. For you to attack my argument (which was all it was, a debate with no ill-will intended) and then start attacking me, call me a nazi, and then say you don't even care about HP, then you started more drama then is truly necessary.
That's fine if you think that. I've debated enough already and there is plenty of rebuttle already out there for why or why not it is financially a good idea.
The point: if it's not happening, then we shouldn't be giving it any light of day. If you still feel the need to discuss it, fine, but just remember that it probably won't be happening any time soon.
My posts were not meant to be harsh, just realistic, there's no need to get people's hopes up when this isn't happening. If you took offense to that, then you took my words in the wrong way.
Testtrack321 said:
Testtrack321 said:
Disneydreaming said:You have a sick mind. Its not even funny. Its a shame people can't have a serious discussion without immaturity rearing its ugly head.
Would a rabbit with a pancake on its head be just as twisted?Disneydreaming said:You have a sick mind. Its not even funny. Its a shame people can't have a serious discussion without immaturity rearing its ugly head.
Tigger1988 said:![]()
Hmmm?
lol, thats flippin' hilarious.Testtrack321 said:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.