DreamfinderGuy
Well-Known Member
From that one site we don't speak of. Bye bye ugly burnt orange!
Very fair pointsthere are some issues with building them over parking lots.. although i love the concept... for one... people would hit the support poles, it reduces parking spots, makes finding your car harder, and to a much lesser extent can increase theft and crime as there are more blind spots. They are doing them right currently, although on top of buildings is another great option. That gravity building could have them for one or any show building. Im just glad they havent tried wind, although the wildlife regulations might be part of that.
Disneyland Paris wants a wordthere are some issues with building them over parking lots.. although i love the concept... for one... people would hit the support poles, it reduces parking spots, makes finding your car harder, and to a much lesser extent can increase theft and crime as there are more blind spots.
Exactly what I was thinking about when I mentioned it.Disneyland Paris wants a word
Disneyland Paris Embarks on One of the Largest Solar Canopy Energy Projects in Europe
Today is World Energy Day, and we have some big news that we’re excited to share! Disneyland Paris is proud to announce that it is building one of the largest solar canopy plants in all of Europe! Pictured below, the solar plant will be developeddisneyparks.disney.go.com
its a great idea although would be better if it moved to match the sun, but it still has all the issues i mentioned. The shade would be nice as an extra but you are still losing parking spots and people will hit them (although this design is one of the best ive seen to get past that. Also like a parking garage its harder to find your car and easier for crimes to occur.Exactly what I was thinking about when I mentioned it.
...makes finding your car harder
while that helps and so do the parking markers its still easier for people to look over a parking lot than any covered structureI dunno. I'm thinking it's easier to remember 'Donald Duck' and see his elevated pic from a distance (DLP press photo from above) than it is to remember and look for a faded number on the cement here in FL.
Aren't all six-year-olds armed with their own iPhone these days, anyway? Mine tells me where I parked my car.
I could have sworn they repainted it orange during this project? BizarreFrom that one site we don't speak of. Bye bye ugly burnt orange!View attachment 572015View attachment 572016
Rat isn't an E-Ticket, and with Guardians opening we're now equal with peak EPCOT's amount of thrill rides, down another dark ride.I cant wait for the GotG coasster to open up! Epcot was in desperate need of some rides and GOtG, along with Rat really bump up the e-ticket count!
They did. They're now painting it back to grey.I could have sworn they repainted it orange during this project? Bizarre
I consider Rat an E-ticket. So does disney I believeRat isn't an E-Ticket, and with Guardians opening we're now equal with peak EPCOT's amount of thrill rides, down another dark ride.
They did. They're now painting it back to grey.
Good. The brown, orange, bronze, whatever they had on it is (personally) quite crap looking.From that one site we don't speak of. Bye bye ugly burnt orange!View attachment 572015View attachment 572016
If Rat is an E-Ticket then so was Universe of Energy. Both of them are trackless screen rides with one impressive physical show scene.I consider Rat an E-ticket. So does disney I believe
Eh, this feels a little disingenuous. I know popularity isn’t the end all be decider of ride catergories and while I don’t believe Rat is a game changer attraction, it pretty clearly will become one of the best liked and heavily ridden attractions at Epcot. I think it’s pretty obviously an E in that context.If Rat is an E-Ticket then so was Universe of Energy. Both of them are trackless screen rides with one impressive physical show scene.
It’s a pretty impressive ride even if it’s a clone and it has some undeniably effective sequences.
If Rat is an E-Ticket then so was Universe of Energy. Both of them are trackless screen rides with one impressive physical show scene.
Not sure if either of you have been on Rat in Paris (I have). Rat is like Spider-Man at Uni. It drives around, jarring you left/right as you travel to different rooms to look at different screens. It's rather fast moving and the mixture of screen and over-sized physical props make you feel like you've shrunk and are scurrying for your life.Out of curiosity, what makes it so impressive? I see all this praise for Disney's trackless dark rides, especially Rise of the Resistance, but they all seem to be on the weaker end of the spectrum to me.
I haven’t been to check out RotR yet (haven’t been to a Disney park where it’s open since it’s opened) and Rat is the only one I’ve ridden. I did think it felt a little sparse as it is mostly screens with physical sets added in but I did find the RV movements fun, the queue is very solid, and tone of the ride very fun. The giant screen for the climax makes for a very impressive effect and works much better than most of the other screens on the ride.Out of curiosity, what makes it so impressive? I see all this praise for Disney's trackless dark rides, especially Rise of the Resistance, but they all seem to be on the weaker end of the spectrum to me.
Then they should have called it "Communistreet."If you really compare the two, CC and Main Street have a heck of a lot more in common than the plaza hub and CC. It's like it serves both purposes. For Future World, it's a core, for World Showcase, it's the thing that funnels you towards it (that is, if you're skipping Future World, kinda like going straight to Fantasyland at MK). And yeah, most of Main Street's exterior doesn't actually suggest what's on the inside at this point. CC doesn't have this issue because it's not trying to mimic anything, you can just stick signage on it. And does anyone remember park maps?
So I guess the giant signs that said "restaurant", "gifts", "character spot", and "innoventions" weren't obvious enough? They should've just put a House of Magic facade over MouseGear, that would tell people it's a gift shop.As for Main Street's exterior, you may not know exactly what is behind each facade, but I'd bet 99% would guess shop or eatery.
Oh, you've been referencing the course-corrections, my bad.So I guess the giant signs that said "restaurant", "gifts", "character spot", and "innoventions" weren't obvious enough? They should've just put a House of Magic facade over MouseGear, that would tell people it's a gift shop.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.