matt9112
Well-Known Member
That blue paint sure makes the building disappear doesn’t it?
i know the cost would have been high but with effort and money they could have sunk the building a bit right? sink it 20 feet? would have helped?
That blue paint sure makes the building disappear doesn’t it?
Blue. They'll say it's a new lake.
Im not sure 20 feet would have made a difference.i know the cost would have been high but with effort and money they could have sunk the building a bit right? sink it 20 feet? would have helped?
So is there any definitive confirmation about what happened to all the dinos?
I recall hearing a rumor the WDW railroad might get its own primeval world diorama. One can certainly dream
The cost is already ridiculously high so who knowsi know the cost would have been high but with effort and money they could have sunk the building a bit right? sink it 20 feet? would have helped?
Yeah, I agree, and if they had done so, wouldn't they have likely had to lower the loading zone inside the old Energy Pavillion down 20 feet as well, given that loading zone for most coasters is at their lowest point? And I suspect that excavating 20 feet down in an existing structure risks undermining the existing supports for the building and so we would have ended up losing the entire old structure, though some would say that with it being totally gutted it's already practically lost.Im not sure 20 feet would have made a difference.
So is there any definitive confirmation about what happened to all the dinos?
I recall hearing a rumor the WDW railroad might get its own primeval world diorama. One can certainly dream
The Dinos That were serviceable and well/cautiously removed were sent to DL as spares. One or two also wound up at the Archives if I recall.Disneyland's Diorama just came out of refurb, maybe they were swapping parts with ones from UOE's?
Disneyland's Diorama just came out of refurb, maybe they were swapping parts with ones from UOE's?
Related tweet of what we know for sure made it out:The Dinos That were serviceable and well/cautiously removed were sent to DL as spares. One or two also wound up at the Archives if I recall.
The view of the show building doesn’t bother me much at all. But has anyone seen the length Tokyo Disney Sea is willing to go to stay in theme? They are seriously going all out to hide their Soarin’ show building and I totally understand the fact this is the standard fans have expected out of Disney since the beginning. I don’t want to expect less from Disney. To be fair their Soarin’ showbuilding is very much in public eye but Tokyo reminds me of why I fell in love with Disney.
I don’t know track layout specifics and the space needed for show scenes (if there are any on the track portion in the gravity building) but if sinking the whole structure 20’ down wouldn’t make a huge impact sinking sections of the track might have helped reduce the overall height of the building. Imagine dropping the whole building down 20’ and then having a loop or something dug even deeper similar to how many roller coasters travel under walkways or paths through a concrete tunnel. If something like that reduces the height by 40’ overall then only 90’ of the total 130’ height would still be exposed. A hill with tall southern pines or other tall growing trees could have gone a long way to hiding the gravity building. Southern pines typically grow 50-80’ tall.Im not sure 20 feet would have made a difference.
I don’t know track layout specifics and the space needed for show scenes (if there are any on the track portion in the gravity building) but if sinking the whole structure 20’ down wouldn’t make a huge impact sinking sections of the track might have helped reduce the overall height of the building. Imagine dropping the whole building down 20’ and then having a loop or something dug even deeper similar to how many roller coasters travel under walkways or paths through a concrete tunnel. If something like that reduces the height by 40’ overall then only 90’ of the total 130’ height would still be exposed. A hill with tall southern pines or other tall growing trees could have gone a long way to hiding the gravity building. Southern pines typically grow 50-80’ tall.
The view of the show building doesn’t bother me much at all. But has anyone seen the length Tokyo Disney Sea is willing to go to stay in theme? They are seriously going all out to hide their Soarin’ show building and I totally understand the fact this is the standard fans have expected out of Disney since the beginning. I don’t want to expect less from Disney. To be fair their Soarin’ showbuilding is very much in public eye but Tokyo reminds me of why I fell in love with Disney.
That's a much more expensive proposition in FL than CA. With the high water table, they typically don't dig below ground level, except for specific purposes. That's why much of Magic Kingdom, including Main St. and Fantasyland is actually the second story with their full basements being the real ground floor. Some examples of actual excavation include the tunnel under the hub linking Main St. and Fantasyland, the Epcot tunnel from next to the back of Living Seas to Innoventions, and the elevator pits and turntable for the Resistance Shuttle at Rise of the Resistance at DHL. This is why you get the high profile of Soarin' and the elevated theater entrance at American Adventure.
Nor from MCO.Nor inside the park.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.