Captain Chaos
Well-Known Member
Ahhh I love when people swear they know source material like the back of their hand, then others come in and prove them wrong... Makes my day every time...
The books do too.![]()
That's exactly what he was. He was a "Curse-breaker" which is basically an archaeologist that recovers gold and treasures from cursed tombs.
And Bill did indeed take a desk job at Gringotts after the Triwizard Tournament and the reformation of the Order of the Pheonix in order to be closer to home and work for the order. It's there that he began dating Fleur.
I'm aware that he came back to London to live since he was in the later books, but I don't recall him working back at Gringotts. From my understanding he came back just to be a part of the Order. Would't he have been handy when the main characters tried to break in in book 7? Why wasn't this addressed in the books? BTW, anybody can read Harry Potter wiki.![]()
The site backs up what he is saying because that is the exact site he used to look up the information he posted. lolWell, the Harry Potter Wiki backs up the fact that he had a desk job along with Fleur.
Read the book, it was addressed. When they arrive at Shell Cottage it is mentioned that the Weasleys were now officially going into hiding (with part of the family at the cottage and the rest at Aunt Muriels). Bill also tries to figure out what they are planning with Griphook but it is explicitly mentioned that Harry and the gang wanted Bill in the dark because they didn't want him to know the specifics of the plan (Hermione becoming Bellatrix).
Now you're just being obtuse I'm afraid, those were pretty plainly stated plot points.
The site backs up what he is saying because that is the exact site he used to look up the information he posted. lol
Your telling me to read the book? Wasn't it you that confused Bill with Arthur just a moment ago? Wasn't it you who said you don't have the books anymore? Get off Harry Potter Wiki and read them yourself.
I'm aware that he came back to London to live since he was in the later books, but I don't recall him working back at Gringotts. From my understanding he came back just to be a part of the Order. Would't he have been handy when the main characters tried to break in in book 7? Why wasn't this addressed in the books? BTW, anybody can read Harry Potter wiki.![]()
Deflection: cute, but when your failed point is in text for everyone to see it doesn't really work. Your counter was proven wrong. If you cannot disprove it then go away. You're making yourself look sad.
What better scenes are being left out? Out of the whole series, I can only think of two instances where we are taken into Gringotts.I can admit if I miss a small plot point or two. It happens. But even if he had a part time job that came with a desk for a few months, this doesn't constitute and entire scene in the ride, sorry. Which is my point anyway. There are so many better scenes that are being left out of the "leaked" ride description. But I still know the difference between Arthur and Bill Weasley. And thanks for calling me cute.
I can admit if I miss a small plot point or two.
But even if he had a part time job that came with a desk for a few months, this doesn't constitute and entire scene in the ride, sorry.
Yea, and anyone can read the books too. Which I do. Once a year. It's said when you find out Bill and Fleur are dating that Bill returned to London to work with the Order and got a desk job at Gringotts, where he met Fleur and started dating/giving her English lessons.
Nice try, though.
Backup? At least I own the books. Bye. *teehee*I know you were hoping to hide it with your sad attempt at a witty reply; but let the record show that our Harry Potter expert has finally realized that they have no backup for their argument and are in fact wrong. Have a good one.
My book collection (outside of 7) did not come with me when I moved out of my parents. No time/means for proper research; but I trust it was in the books. Sounds familiar and Bill was established as being around from book 5 on IIRC. The brain just likes to leave those things out when you see a seemingly easy point to jump on in a thread
.
Why do theme park fans so deny the abilities of the medium for which they claim fandom? Why must it be a slave to other mediums? Why can't there be something new about this world we only learn through the themed experience?
Also, our resident flip-flopper has gone on record today. Take note. Or "let the record show".
That doesn't have anything to do with the fact that you are wrong about something and he is right.At least I own the books. Bye. *teehee*
I agree with you on this. I would actually prefer a ride and queue experience that delivers layers of the Wizarding World we haven't already experienced in the books/movies. Particularly since one of the strongest things about the Potter series is its vivid world-building. Getting a chance to glimpse the peripheries of Jk's world is actually quite exciting. And speaking of J.K, considering how she is very much involved in approving everything that goes into WWOHP, I would bet that she specifically told the designers what Bill's office might look like and what interesting enchantments non-canon Gringott vaults might contain. This, in and of itself, is incredibly exciting.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.