Why do you think they chose blue for the tile????? Doesn't really match anything else at the Grand.
It does seem less landscaped. Maybe it is the plastic fence that goes around the pool blocking out the beauty and openness from ground level. It now has the same kind of fencing that my local Burger King and Taco Bell has to block the view of their dumpsters.The new area seems very incongruous. Does anyone else think that the area seems a lot more stark and less landscaped? Did they take down any trees when they were refurbishing the pool? The picket fence seems out of place, though I can't tell if that was there before.
The direction the resort is taking is of concern to me. I know some people will love the pool, splash pad, and new DVC and some will not. I feel that the sight lines of the GF are getting cluttered and ruined. The sense of class and refinement are rapidly fading away as the price to stay at this resort soars. I hope families will enjoy this resort as much as mine did for years to come. But for my family who are no longer children, the resort is losing many things that used to attract us there. It is getting harder and harder to my older teens to want to stay at the GF. Not because of the atmosphere but because two of the main areas they liked to hang out during the day are not longer viable options for them.(Beach and Deep end of Courtyard pool). Lots of pressure to go else where in the country every-time now. It makes me sad and very disappointed
The new area seems very incongruous. Does anyone else think that the area seems a lot more stark and less landscaped? Did they take down any trees when they were refurbishing the pool? The picket fence seems out of place, though I can't tell if that was there before.
It does seem less landscaped. Maybe it is the plastic fence that goes around the pool blocking out the beauty and openness from ground level. It now has the same kind of fencing that my local Burger King and Taco Bell has to block the view of their dumpsters.
Is it for safety or for preventing trashy people from pool-hopping when they haven't paid to stay at the resort. It's a viable issue when you allow everyone to come to your resort (purportedly for dining) and it seems that the plan is to eventually have all WDW pools fenced in (look at Art of Animation). Personally, if it makes for smaller crowds at the pools and ensures that only paying guests are present, I'm for it.Yeah, that fence looks really cheap and tacky looking. If I remember correctly, I don't think there was a fence around the pool before. Everything looked much more open and the pool just kind of fit there naturally. While I do understand their desire to fence it in for safety reasons, I think it's kind of jarring to the landscape that was there.
I understand the need to enclose the pool for safety sake and to prevent pool hopping. Putting a plastic fence around the pool isn't the way to do it. The Grand is already running with an Alice and Wonderland theme, so why don't they use manicured hedges, or gardens. This would make a natural barrier for the pool. It would also look much more natural and tie into the current theme of the resort.
I'm not criticizing or arguing (honest) but I've seen similar criticism and I don't get it (not that I need to). The Grand Floridian isn't the Four Seasons or even the hotels its design was based on. Among Disney World hotels it may be among the least themed in terms of Disney characters or other IP but at the end of the day, it's still a Walt Disney World (theme park) hotel. I don't know how "refined" any hotel is where the normal attire in most of their restaurants includes Donald Duck t-shirts.
Again, I'm not criticizing the hotel (we're going this month!) or your post but I do think that what they're doing does fit the property just fine. Then again, ask me if I still feel this way after spending an afternoon listening to the clanging bell of the new splash area!
I am not trying to be mean or critical. Please don't take it that way. I appreciate yours and everyones opinion. That what makes this form fun.I understand your points. My main concern is the lack of entertainment for my teenage family members at this resort. The two main areas which they enjoy have just been removed (beach) and reworked to limit the swimming area(CYP). Walking in pools don't do it for them. I understand your point that Disney is for families and agree 100% it should be family friendly and have characters. Disney, however should not exclude older children and young adults. These two demographics are being squeeze by Disney's new direction for their hotel pools. The theme of the hotel has always been Victorian, which is supposed to be classy and clean. It is not the Ritz, Waldorf, or Four Seasons, I know that. The Waldorf can be booked for half the cost of the GF with much nicer rooms. But its not Disney. It does not have the Disney feel. Although not overpowering in its theme, the GF is Disney. It is its flagship resort. It meant to be "Disney" upscale. The new directions in my opinion are dragging it down. That being said it is just my opinion and I am just venting. I am sure many familys will absolutely love the new resort features. It is still an amazing hotel and the feeling there is like no other. You and your family will a great time there. Make sure you give an update on how your trip was. I can not make it down until summer.
Fair points.I understand your points. My main concern is the lack of entertainment for my teenage family members at this resort. The two main areas which they enjoy have just been removed (beach) and reworked to limit the swimming area(CYP). Walking in pools don't do it for them. I understand your point that Disney is for families and agree 100% it should be family friendly and have characters. Disney, however should not exclude older children and young adults. These two demographics are being squeeze by Disney's new direction for their hotel pools. The theme of the hotel has always been Victorian, which is supposed to be classy and clean. It is not the Ritz, Waldorf, or Four Seasons, I know that. The Waldorf can be booked for half the cost of the GF with much nicer rooms. But its not Disney. It does not have the Disney feel. Although not overpowering in its theme, the GF is Disney. It is its flagship resort. It meant to be "Disney" upscale. The new directions in my opinion are dragging it down. That being said it is just my opinion and I am just venting. I am sure many familys will absolutely love the new resort features. It is still an amazing hotel and the feeling there is like no other. You and your family will a great time there. Make sure you give an update on how your trip was. I can not make it down until summer.
Yeah, that fence looks really cheap and tacky looking.
Is it for safety or for preventing trashy people from pool-hopping when they haven't paid to stay at the resort. It's a viable issue when you allow everyone to come to your resort (purportedly for dining) and it seems that the plan is to eventually have all WDW pools fenced in (look at Art of Animation). Personally, if it makes for smaller crowds at the pools and ensures that only paying guests are present, I'm for it.
I understand your points. My main concern is the lack of entertainment for my teenage family members at this resort. The two main areas which they enjoy have just been removed (beach) and reworked to limit the swimming area(CYP). Walking in pools don't do it for them. I understand your point that Disney is for families and agree 100% it should be family friendly and have characters. Disney, however should not exclude older children and young adults. These two demographics are being squeeze by Disney's new direction for their hotel pools. The theme of the hotel has always been Victorian, which is supposed to be classy and clean. It is not the Ritz, Waldorf, or Four Seasons, I know that. The Waldorf can be booked for half the cost of the GF with much nicer rooms. But its not Disney. It does not have the Disney feel. Although not overpowering in its theme, the GF is Disney. It is its flagship resort. It meant to be "Disney" upscale. The new directions in my opinion are dragging it down. That being said it is just my opinion and I am just venting. I am sure many familys will absolutely love the new resort features. It is still an amazing hotel and the feeling there is like no other. You and your family will a great time there. Make sure you give an update on how your trip was. I can not make it down until summer.
I'm not criticizing or arguing (honest) but I've seen similar criticism and I don't get it (not that I need to). The Grand Floridian isn't the Four Seasons or even the hotels its design was based on. Among Disney World hotels it may be among the least themed in terms of Disney characters or other IP but at the end of the day, it's still a Walt Disney World (theme park) hotel. I don't know how "refined" any hotel is where the normal attire in most of their restaurants includes Donald Duck t-shirts.
Again, I'm not criticizing the hotel (we're going this month!) or your post but I do think that what they're doing does fit the property just fine. Then again, ask me if I still feel this way after spending an afternoon listening to the clanging bell of the new splash area!
Is it for safety or for preventing trashy people from pool-hopping when they haven't paid to stay at the resort. It's a viable issue when you allow everyone to come to your resort (purportedly for dining) and it seems that the plan is to eventually have all WDW pools fenced in (look at Art of Animation). Personally, if it makes for smaller crowds at the pools and ensures that only paying guests are present, I'm for it.
Saw it in person last night, have to agree. So cheap/tacky that I'm wondering if it's temporary.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.