Sweet Melissa
Well-Known Member
There are a lot of scenes from the '60s and '70s Disney animated features with drawings that seemed to be almost cannibalized art from earlier films. For instance:And the point would be?????
There are a lot of scenes from the '60s and '70s Disney animated features with drawings that seemed to be almost cannibalized art from earlier films. For instance:And the point would be?????
Lmao! Omg that is hilarious! I remember that scene too! I always want a cookie of a cracker after that! Lol and I would eat like the little mouse too!
Then there are people like me, that for some strange reason do not go through miles of filmed animation to compare each scene from years ago. Like me they might also not begin to find it necessary to capture every frame of an animated product to memory and be able to say...Hey... didn't I just see that in 1955? Or, and this is probably the most important...what possible difference does it make if they use the same pose that was used 50 years ago. Does it change the quality of the story or artwork or in anyway alter the enjoyment of the feature? I'm thinking no! But for those that find it important enough to feel the need to get superior over those that don't find it to be an affront to the unsuspecting public...well, I hope it didn't ruin the experience for you.Needs text to make it a proper "meme" (because hipsters do not get subtle hints). Something like:
Largest pool of animation talent on the planet...
...resorts to tracing over old films to rush new ones out to an unsuspecting public.
Then there are people like me, that for some strange reason do not go through miles of filmed animation to compare each scene from years ago. Like me they might also not begin to find it necessary to capture every frame of an animated product to memory and be able to say...Hey... didn't I just see that in 1955? Or, and this is probably the most important...what possible difference does it make if they use the same pose that was used 50 years ago. Does it change the quality of the story or artwork or in anyway alter the enjoyment of the feature? I'm thinking no! But for those that find it important enough to feel the need to get superior over those that don't find it to be an affront to the unsuspecting public...well, I hope it didn't ruin the experience for you.
In this case the "unsuspecting public" equals those of us that now know...still don't care public!
Lmao! I know! When all these people were talking about her non-existing butt, I couldn't stop talking about her tongue sticking out (not to mention that she sounded horrible and that she couldn't dance to save her life....).^ I am really hating the Stupid tongue crap she does...Is she having a stroke?
There are a lot of scenes from the '60s and '70s Disney animated features with drawings that seemed to be almost cannibalized art from earlier films. For instance:
BTW, the 2014 Unofficial Guide to WDW has a reference to Miley Cyrus as being the current Disney "teeny bopper" or something like that. Doh! - they just missed the chance to scratch that!
Those are really interesting! Copying art like that was common with a lot of the old paperback books, but I've never seen it displayed this way for Disney films.
BTW, the 2014 Unofficial Guide to WDW has a reference to Miley Cyrus as being the current Disney "teeny bopper" or something like that. Doh! - they just missed the chance to scratch that!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.