Disney Irish
Premium Member
I'm not here to debate Kennedy for the millionth time, we done that for years. She is gone, she is out the door, no reason to redebate all that over again. Yes she wasn't a creative, acknowledged.Feige is in my opinion a creative. And I absolutely believe that is why the MCU did what it did. Absolutely he was an architect more than anything. But without his creative side it might not have worked as well. You have to be creative to fit the films together and know how the progression is going to go. He needs to make decisions based on creativity to make adjustments when needed. Just because he's not writing the scripts or directing doesn't mean he's not creative. Feige is probably the perfect balance of creative and business. There's no world where Kennedy could manage any of that. Because she doesn't have the creative vision as we've seen in star wars.
That's one of the biggest downsides to Kennedy. She has zero in the creative department. Plus she doesn't understand star wars in the least. If Kevin was in charge of star wars, I know you'd never hear something as idiotic as "well we don't have years of stories from comics novels like the mcu to go by".
As for Feige, what gives you indication that he is an actual creative? He has no creative credits to his name, he has been a producer since the day he started in Hollywood in the 90s. Other than being the architect behind the MCU he hasn't actually created anything.